User talk:BoolaBoola2

St. Anthony Hall: old Delta chapter house demolished?

Did you add the information that the old Delta chapter house is no longer extant? Please see my comment at Talk:St. Anthony Hall. —crism 09:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC) (Κ 1991) Thanks and hello, Crism - I sent you a mesg. to your e-mail address. BoolaBoola2[reply]

I am filled with wonder after you edit the WHS entry.

Nice job.SLY111 15:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)SLY111[reply]

hey, ypu documents?

I don't mean to be a pest, but did you ever happen to come across the documents from the YPU of yore that you mentioned you had? (see my talk page)

Best,

-Paul

Vivisel 12:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 6th: Take your time! (: I appreciate the effort!

-Paul

Vivisel 21:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - glad to hear you've found the Union documents. I'll be happy to see them, and to pass them on to the relevant undergrads! Click here to email me: (link removed since you emailed). (I am very spam-averse, hence the obfuscation!

Thanks very much!

P.S. Perhaps you're aware that the YPU 75th anniversary gala is fast approaching? See here for details: http://www.yale.edu/ypu/alumni/. --Vivisel (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:YaleElizabethanClubBorosonGarden.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:P1070553.JPG. The copy called Image:P1070553.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first picture...

obliterates the Contents box when one first opens the entry. What, if anything, might be done, in the name of Henry Luce?!SLY111 12:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)SLY111 Nice job on the first picture...can the same alchemy improve the presentation on the second picture?SLY111 15:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)SLY111[reply]

Excellent pictures of BZ's tomb.

BZ has my favorite setting for a tomb. All is peaceful beyond Grove Street, and the BZ tomb looms largely over the peace.SLY111 17:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)SLY 111[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Beetle_Cats.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beetle_Cats.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yale Elizabethan Club Phoenix Motif.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yale Elizabethan Club Phoenix Motif.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabethan Club

Hello, I was looking at the Lizzie entry and noticed that a number of the links don't work. I replaced the one on the Leverett-Griswold family with one I thought was along the same lines of where the original might have linked, but if this is an entry you're interested in (I notice you took the rather nice photos), you might want to have a look at some of the other non-working links as well. By the way, good user name. MarmadukePercy (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eli's Chosen Six

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eli's Chosen Six requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TM 16:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moritz Landé

I like you to know that I have posted a German article about Moritz Landé. I also corrected your English version as it was partially based on wrong informations. 1. He is born in Ostrowo, but not in Poland. At the time of his birth, Ostrowo was within the Prussian Province of Posen, so he is born as a German. 2. His daughter Thekla was born in Ostrowo in 1864 so he probably didn't move to Berlin before this year. 3. He is definitely not the architect of Europe's largest Jewish cemetery in Berlin-Weissensee as I contacted the cemetery administration and its support association as well as Centrum Judaica in Berlin in that matter. But I got the unexpected information that someone named Emil Landé, a bricklayer, was involved in the construction project of this cemetery. Maybe this caused the wrong information. This is published in a German book by Wolfgang Gottschalk (author): Die Friedhöfe der Jüdischen Gemeinde zu Berlin (transl.: Cemeteries of the Jewish Community in Berlin). Argon Verlag, Berlin 1992, p. 61. ISBN 3-8702-4201-9. 4. You also uploaded a picture of Moritz Landé referring to an unknown German photographer as author. That's right. But I found that your picture is no original. It is definitely a copy of an older original as the given photo studio's name below the pic A. Jandorf & Co. Berlin didn't exist during the lifetime of Moritz Landé. This company – a Berlin-based warehouse-chain, started in 1892. Germany's most-famous warehouse KaDeWe was part of this chain and is the only remainder of this former group. This is only a minor addition but maybe of interest to you since you are claiming to be Moritz Landés great-grandson. In the German Wikipedia I am actually uploading pictures and articles about the Landé family (Hugo, Thekla, Alfred, Charlotte, Franz). ArcCan (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some more interesting news: A Landé family member in France I contacted claims that your uploaded picture is not Moritz but Jacob Landé, his brother. As I have seen he was an architect, too. If we can get that clear the uploaded picture has to be removed since the file name is not correct then. ArcCan (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New facts added to the article as I got the research results of Centrum Judaicum of New Synagogue Berlin in that matter. Now data are based on burial records of Jewish Cemetery Berlin-Weissensee. ArcCan (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HaightBuildingStA'sYaleBxW.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HaightBuildingStA'sYaleBxW.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Brad Dourif 2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brad Dourif 2013.jpg, which you've attributed to Carol Rosegg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BoolaBoola2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]