User talk:Bonsecoursjoe
License tagging for Image:SMH full.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:SMH full.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
St. Mary's Hospital
[edit]{{hangon}}
A tag has been placed on St. Mary's Hospital (Richmond), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pishogue (talk) 03:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted Richmond Hospital to a non-spam version, rather than just delete it. Since this is the second time today, I've also semi-protected it, again as preferable to deletion. All claims must be supported by verifiable, preferably in-line, independent references, especially apparently advertising material like the last sentence. Jimfbleak (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)