User talk:Bonnieblagg

Welcome

Hello, Bonnieblagg, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

So I've rewritten the page with as much detail as I can find. What do you suggest as the next step? 05:10, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Bonnie

Bonnieblagg, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antiworld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antiworld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 13:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-I'm not sure if this is the correct venue to discuss this or not but I would like to explain my position. I created an account to start documenting Portland punk bands and the West Coast punk scene. I am not a paid editor. Please let me know how to correct the COI issues. I had planned on making pages for some of the clubs and festivals that I cited in the Antiworld page. As many of the clubs are closing and the music scene is changing, I think these are important things to record. This is my first time contributing to Wikipedia so please let me know how to resolve the issues that have been raised. Bonnieblagg (talk) 01:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnie, the problem is that the sources have to be considered reliable ones, and to conform to WP:RS. This means newspapers, music magazines or music websites with journalists and editorial control are okay, but blogs set up by one person are not. Neither are the artist's own official website or social media, because they are not independent and impartial (so no Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud, etc.). The likes of Discogs and iMDb are simply listing sites that prove the records exist, not that they are notable, and likewise online stores and streaming sites like Amazon, iTunes, Spotify and Deezer just show that the records exist and can be heard/bought. You really need to find coverage of the band (interviews with the band, or reviews of the records) in local newspapers or music magazines like Rolling Stone. Yes, I know that's going to be hard for a band that were around over 20 years ago and before the internet was available... that's why articles for bands like this don't exist that easily on Wikipedia. Richard3120 (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-thank you so much! That helps a lot! Bonnieblagg (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As well as Portland newspapers, back issues of The Portland Phoenix (https://www.portlandphoenix.me/) would probably also be very helpful in finding sources regarding Portland's alternative scene. I have no idea if the public library there would have copies of these, I'm just saying that these would be good places to start looking for sources. Unless you can improve the Antiworld article in the next few days, it's likely to be deleted... but if you really think you could find three or four decent sources to make an article, then copy a draft of the article into your sandbox, and then you can work on it for as long as you like... when you think it is ready for publication again, you could recreate the article in mainspace. Richard3120 (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- I moved the article back to being a draft. I will update the citations and republish. Bonnieblagg (talk) 20:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request assistance before trying to move the article back to mainspace, because the deletion discussion was closed as delete. —C.Fred (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Will do, thanks for the advice. Bonnieblagg (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Antiworld. Thank you. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 13:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments in the "Nominated for Deletion" talk page. Bonnieblagg (talk) 01:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Antiworld

Hello, Bonnieblagg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antiworld".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]