User talk:Bond007ca

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to University of Phoenix, you will be blocked from editing. - Smashville 02:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was an accident. Sorry

Persistent re-addition of content to University of Phoenix

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University of Phoenix. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Reswobslc 01:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous it is the other users that have removed my edits. Who is your boss? I would like to speak with whoever is in charge. his is why wikipedia does not have relevance in the academic world. What does it take to maintain accurate verifiable information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bond007ca (talk • contribs)

Your edits keep getting reverted because they violate Wikipedia rules. There isn't a "boss" so to speak - the same rules go for everybody. Let's analyze what you keep posting in detail.

"The website is poorly designed and its creators "apologize for the appearance and quality of the website". UOP Sucks and its designer alleges to have attended the University and graduated from its MBA program . This assertion (along with the many allegations on the website) has never been proven. Additionally, the website's admin removes positive posts from its forums."

This violates Wikipedia's original research rule, because the statement that this web site is "poorly designed" is your personal opinion, as is your statement that the admin removes "positive" posts. Further, whether the designer attended the university is not a matter of dispute. Also, although there is no rule that requires perfect usage of the English language, it's worth pointing out that UOP Sucks is a web site, not a student, and the site itself didn't attend the university with its designer as your text appears to say.

"The allegations above did not stop the University from further accreditation. University of Phoenix's business degree programs are accredited by the Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs ACBSP."

The ACBSP accreditation is already mentioned, and the statement that "the allegations above did not stop the University" violates the neutral point of view policy, as the phrase tries to express an opinion from a seemingly promotional point of view for the university.

"However, it remains to be seen if companies if Intel changes its view in light of the Univeristy's latest MBA accreditation. University of Phoenix's business degree programs are accredited by the Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs ACBSP.

Again, the ACBSP has already been mentioned, and the "it remains to be seen" statement is against the rules because it is pure speculation. See WP:CRYSTAL - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.
Please review the guidelines. I think people recognize that you are editing in good faith and people recognize that newer editors are unfamiliar with the rules, but they are non-negotiable and will get your edits reverted if you ignore them. Reswobslc 05:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]