Jump to content

User talk:Bonadea/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

/* request for removal of peakock tags

inappropriate tags

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

there is enough citation for article vishal kandukuri. where half of the reference are in telugu language which can be taken as legitimate sources according to Wikipedia rules. more over, most of telugu daily news do not hold online directory's for direct links, but citations are given to the article precisely with specific links and articles photocopys, and the link to the Deccan Chronicle reference is broken - the Wayback Machine seems to have archived the article, but the machine handling that page is currently down. Once it's up again we should add a link to the archived version of that source to the footnote.

I am concerned that the requestor seeks to point out as in a negative note and personal attack on the article. as article has been accepted few months before, article is currently in need of development. peacock tags to the article inappropriate.

Responded at Talk:Vishal Kandukuri. --bonadea contributions talk 22:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
reference taken from vishalkandukuri.blogspot.com is just a part of information in the article. a whole bunch of information is also taken from primary sources such as "postnoon news", hydstartups", "epaper-namastetelangana news", "epaper-sakshi.com", "deccanchornicle.com", "hybiztv.com". i request , not to just focus on one or 2 secondary sources, but rather look into whole other primary sources and take other language high-quality sources into consideration is my only concern. thank you very much for your contribution and instant response.Saveeducation (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
But, um, Blogspot is not a reliable source. Period (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
i am conscious that blogspot is not a reliable source, but recently direct links for few articles are broken, the wayback machine archived the articles. so the screen shots along with photocopys of those specific articles are been posted in this blogspot for reference to the article is what clearly is. Saveeducation (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

V Adept Energy is not a business development firm, it is a non profit org. i am very much concern on your drastic deletion of this correct info on st pauls high school alumni page over vishal kandukuri description. please visit google, v adept page or v adept wiki page for clarification. i am currently reediting it correctly. please provide clarification before drastic over righting of wrong informationElsaae (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry on Vishal Kandukuri

Hello Bonadea! I came around article Vishal Kandukuri during a routine patrol and have been noticing quite a few interesting things, mainly Sockpuppetry, as I saw your note on the article talk page indicating just that. And so I will now have to start an SPI Investigation after gathering all the required information and evidence. It would be really helpful if you could provide me with any other/extra useful evidence or info that you might be knowing as it will help make the case strong. You can provide me with the information either here on your talk page, on my talk page or if you prefer through e-mail (if privacy is needed). Thank you :) ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 03:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for this - I've emailed you :-) --bonadea contributions talk 20:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Retailopia is a media site for Online Retailers

Hello Bonadea! I saw you deleting my couple of posts on Wikipedia. It is not a spam. It is an online media site for internet retailers. Could you please provide one source where we can get "List of online shopping website in India" that you have deleted. it is all about information and not spamming. Either you create a section where all the online shopping sites in India get listed or make retailopia post up in the section, or create a new post title list of online shopping sites in India on wikipedia. Please don't delete things just like that. (talk)Tituamitgupta (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Please have a look at the reliable sources policy and the policy regarding external links to find out more about what is considered spam in Wikipedia, and what can and cannot be used as a reference. retailopia.com is not an appropriate external link or reference in Wikipedia - please do not add it to any other articles. It appears that your main interest in editing Wikipedia lies in adding links to retailopic.com to various articles, and just in case you are in any way involved in that website or have been writing for it, you also need to read the policy regarding editing where there's a conflict of interest. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 20:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Belated Happy New Year with a Toast!

float
float

Here's a toast to the host
Of those who edit wiki near and far,
To a friend we send a message, "keep the data up to par".
We drink to those who wrote a lot of prose,
And then they whacked a vandal several dozen blows.
A toast to the host of those who boast, the Wikipedians!
- From {{subst:TheGeneralUser}}

~TheGeneralUser (talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!


Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at ~~~~~


~TheGeneralUser (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A Very Happy (belated) New Year to you Bonadea! And thank you for your help in SPI case. Enjoy the Whisky ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Comparison of webmail providers

Hi Bonadea! You once deleted webmail providers that don't have a Wikipedia article (e.g. Lavabit) in this comparison article. Unfortunately, there is again someone who adds freemail accounts. Could you please help me and have a look at that article? Thanks and best regards. --83.77.56.181 (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look at it and put it on my watchlist. That's the sort of thing that crops up from time to time. Thanks for the heads-up! --bonadea contributions talk 19:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! 83.77.56.181 (talk) 20:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

E-mail enabled ?

Hello Bonadea! Do you have your e-mail enabled on your account ? Because I can't see the "E-mail this user" link in the toolbox. Hope you fix it soon. Cheers! ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Oops, no I didn't - but now I do :-) --bonadea contributions talk 08:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Adminship ?

Hello Bonadea! I was wondering whether you have ever thought and considered running for Adminship ? You seem to do your bit of good and fair work here on Wikipedia and I believe you would most probably make a fine Administrator :) If you also think and believe that you can take up the mop job then I'll be very happy to nominate you for it, and will also find another co-nominator for you if you wish. Decision is yours. Good luck! ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Compas music

I don't know what to do about this, Zouk, Zouk Love and maybe others. Just let them stew in their own juices? I've protected Zouk in the past but once unprotected the battle began again. Dougweller (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Compas music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sinapali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oriya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed Move of Price Comparison Service

Bonadea, I just proposed that we move price comparison service to comparison shopping engine. I noticed you've been involved with the page before, so you may want to join the discussion. Take care! —Neil 07:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

merger discussion of Jack (hero) and Jack tales

As one of a few editors with more than 2 edits to Jack_(hero), I urge you to please review Talk:Jack tales#Merge discussion for merger discussion of Jack (hero) and Jack tales.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, the external link is a link to wikihow.com about how to diet. Why is it inappropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Like subscribe (talk • contribs) 18:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Vending Machines

You just deleted two links that I added to the Vending Machines page. The information fits perfectly and there is another site who you've allowed to add a link. I'm very confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.179.104.146 (talk) 17:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

phpld deletion

I am not an expert on editing in Wikipedia, but I sure would like to have information here that is within the guidelines. Our application has been around a long time and is used by thousands of websites. Applications like Xenforo for example are much newer and not nearly as big as phpLD. I don't care about SEO or any of that, but many people have dedicated significant parts of their like to this web app and I want to recognize them and grow the content about phpLD here over time. Thank you for your consideration.

Joker And Jakkal

Me and a friend are trying to become famous rappers for the Psychopathic Records! we need yalls help on writing some raps so plz help us and we will make yall famous as well! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdocker420 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, I got a first line for you:
I vandalised Wikipedia and my ass was totally blocked.
Best of luck, --bonadea contributions talk 16:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Mumtaz (actress)

Could you please guide me in rectifying my errors? 210.212.78.161 (talk) 09:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I had earlier also requested for help in editing the page, especially in the light of the article being marked for grammatical and idiomatic errors. In the absence of any help from you, I attempted the corrections again. Hence, I am surprised for the reversion of such corrections as well.

Regarding the so called 'promotional hype' let me clarify as under

a. Please have a look at the sites http://www.onlinefmradio.in/masala/topactress.php#gsc.tab=0, http://www.mumtaz.in which confirm about her being on top and being remembered as most beautiful.

b. The site http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/suraiya-most-enduring-ethnic-beauty-mumtaz-close-behind-334273 terms her the second-most 'enduring ethnic' beauty, and not the 'popular' one.

c. The Filmfare Awards are the oldest and most prominent awards for Hindi Cinema in India. They have been often referred to as the Hindi film industry's equivalent to Oscars. Please have a look at the Wikipedia's page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filmfare_Awards. Hence, they are also most coveted. And Mumtaz did win the Best Actress Award in 1970 for Khilona.

d. Mumtaz has been fondly called Mumu since she became famous. A number of published articles and websites would substantiate that. Please have a look at http://www.searchdictionaries.com/?q=mumu, http://www.angelfire.com/celeb/mumtaz/statis.html, http://cine-talkies.com/movies/bollywood-actress/mumtaz/index.php, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-19/food-reviews/30297320_1_juhu-beach-mumtaz-zayed-khan, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0612614/, http://www.apunkachoice.com/names/mum/mumtaz/cid_403/biography/, http://www.surfindia.com/celebrities/bollywood/mumtaz.html, http://www.whereincity.com/movies/bollywood/actress/247, http://www.angelfire.com/celeb/mumtaz/mastmumu.htm.

As Mumtaz has not been in the active film career since 1989, I wonder whether such information can really be termed as 'promotional'.

So kindly have a re-look at the statement of accusing me for 'vandalism'. Also please withdraw your warning for blocking me for publishing allegedly 'unsourced' content. 210.212.78.161 (talk) 10:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot indeed for restoring my edits. You are once again requested to please also remove the warnings from my page.

And one more request for correction - The site http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/suraiya-most-enduring-ethnic-beauty-mumtaz-close-behind-334273 terms her the second-most 'enduring ethnic' beauty, and not the 'popular' one. Moreover, 'declaring' Mumtaz second-most popular beauty may not be correct today, as the present heroines would get far more votes.

Thanks, once again. 210.212.78.161 (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey there Bonadea

I recently added http://likesviewsandfollowers.com as an external link to the social media marketing wiki page but then you have removed it. I think it is 100% associated with social media marketing as the external website is totally related to it. I am hoping you will re-consider adding it to the wiki page.

Looking forward to your reply.

Warm Regards, Mazin Asif :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunn3r321 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Article about Helen M. Radics (you nominated it for deletion)

Hello,

I have done some editing to the article which by the way I created 2 years ago. Up until a week ago there were no problems with the article. The only thing I noticed was the notice about the article being an orphan an needing links, which I complied with. However following the requested links, I kept getting more and more notices on the article and finally for some reason you have nominated my article to be deleted. I am very surprised to see this development as I have gone through the verification process two years ago.

Earlier today I have also noticed a blog entry on my unfair competitor's page (see link: http://exposingtrademarkandcopyrightbullies.blogspot.ca/2013/03/wikipedia-trying-to-remove-trademark.html) who is not surprisingly attempting to get more votes to delete my article. I don't believe that Wikipedia should be allowed to become a battleground for such competitor's and I certainly hope that your nomination for deletion of this article was not influenced in any way by this competitor's actions.

I wish to find out from you why you nominated my article for deletion and what I can do to prevent it.

Thank you for your time,

Csidaranoli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csidaranoli (talk • contribs) 06:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. It is not correct that there were "no problems with the article" up until recently; there were many problems with it, it's just that the people who had been editing it did not have sufficient experience with editing Wikipedia to spot the issues. There are thousands of such articles, and when somebody with experience notices one of them, the article gets heavily edited, which is what happened with the Helem M Radics article. Most of the issues were possible to fix by editing the article - removing promotional language, removing content that did not belong in Wikipedia, removing inappropriate or dead links, and fixing formatting - but the main issue was, and still is, whether the subject is in fact notable, according to Wikipedia's definition of notability. I have spent quite a bit of time editing and improving the article, and I have also put some effort into trying to find sources to show notability, without much success. I also asked you, more than a week ago, to provide reliable secondary sources - the notability issue has been brought up with you before over the years, but unfortunately it seems you have not taken the time to read the information provided for you on your talk page. In any case, the reasons I eventually nominated the page for deletion (after waiting for some time to see if there were more sources) are described in detail in the deletion discussion which you were asked to participate in - I won't waste your time and my own by repeating the arguments here, since the discussion has to take place on the discussion page and not on a user talk page. A deletion discussion is not a vote so even if there's a blog post asking for "votes" (I haven't followed the link so I don't know what it says) that won't affect the outcome of the discussion. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 08:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I just followed the link. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Whoever wrote that blog post does not know how Wikipedia works - I'll put a note on the deletion discussion to inform people who might come there through the blog (which frankly does not seem to have a lot of readers) that this is not a vote. --08:47, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on the article and trying to fix it. I am not very familiar with the process but I will try to do whatever you suggest. As for the discussion I have moved to the page you suggested so please find my reply there. I also wish to thank you for placing the notice about the non-vote part of the discussion process.

Thank you for your time and assistance (Csidaranoli (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC))

Bonadea

Thank you for your email. I didn't think the article explained very well the complexities of pricing a promotional product and how this varies from product to product. This is why there are few fully functional ecommerce sites. I think only 4 in the U.K. The hyper link gave a demonstration of this as it is one of the few fully functional sites. Also the reason there are so many online websites is because suppliers provide these FOC to distributors. However, this has meant the industry has few barriers to entry and always has high competition.

Never mind, I know the facts! promotionalmerchandise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Promotionalmerchandise (talk • contribs) 13:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for dropping by to say hello on my talk page. That was a late but very warm welcome! asdfawesomegreen (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Did you say I did disruptive editing? It makes me very upset because you gave me I may not be blocked! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Davidson (talk • contribs) 18:35, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

LeadLedger website

Hi.. I find that this website is very informative, as they seem to track market shares of various online companies and some other parameters. I was using it to cite some articles that are lacking references, and many articles do.. I did not want to spam or anything, just wanted to improve those articles. --BiH (talk) 10:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

removal of content and links from CLM and Pontis

Hello Bonadea,

I recently updated two topics: Pontis and iCLM and you removed my editions. I would like to request that you re-consider according to the following. I am new to wikipedia (as writing) so I just want to ensure that by no means I intend to overrule the policy and use for promotion, but would like your advise regarding what would be the right way to include it.

CLM- Customer Lifecycle Management is a common term that is covered. However the new approach claims that in order to properly manage customer lifecycle one needs to relate to each consumer/ customer seperately. We in Pontis call this approach iCLM where i stands for an individual. I would like to include in the CLM article the fact that there are new innovative approaches of iCLM.

Pontis - the article currently refers to a SW company called Pontis that deals with bridges. However, I also work for a technology company which is called Pontis. Our customer are communication service providers and I find it problematic that when one look at the topic Pontis they get to another company page and there is no mention to ours. We work with major telecom operators as you can see in our website: www.pontis.com


Please advise, Efrat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakibly (talk • contribs) 09:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

King Sheharyar Mirza (singer)

Thanks for keeping a watchful eye on King Sheharyar Mirza (singer). I've requested semi-protection for the duration of the AFD plus 24 hours, to allow time for it to be closed. The request may be denied as moot since the AFD is scheduled to close tomorrow anyways. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Zarf

It is common knowledge in the North West of England that April 29th is Zarf day. I apologise for presuming it is an internatioanl event. It may only be national. Could you please shed more light on the subject incase i have been misinformed?

Thank you Bonadea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.204.106.190 (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Help and clarification for a beginner

Hi Bonadea,

Thanks for the heads-up on proper use of Wikipedia. As they say on the talk shows, long-time-user, first-time-contributor... or something like that. I have a few point that I would like you to clarify if you could. I read through the links that you indicated regarding proper citation, promotional use, etc (thank you, very informative) but there are still a few things that are fuzzy to me.

1. I am the creator of the content on the official page for QSI. First, does that somehow disqualify me for posting information to Wikipedia? Second, I am plagiarizing myself by copy-and-pasting, which seems kind of oxymoronic, but I can understand where there can be some concern on the part of Wikipedia. Just looking for some clarification there. I didn't feel like rewriting my text over again specifically for Wikipedia, and even if I did, because I wrote it once already I am sure it would come out close enough to the 'other' version as to be considered plagiarism, so, how would I go about writing, for example, a 'different' history section about the QSI organization that will pass muster?

2. Point number one aside, although I am not sure I fully agree with the History section as being promotional (does use of tense make a difference here?) I can see where it may be close to the line. But, the 'list of schools' and the 'associations' with the supporting references seem very appropriate to me. If the issue is the missing pages for many of the schools, that is something I am working on here, but if the issue is otherwise, I am curious to know what it might be. A simple list of the schools that QSI operates seems very appropriate encyclopedic material to me, but again, I am new to this so there may be something I am missing.

3. By reverting ALL of my changes we have now gone back to a page containing false information again. While you did update the country/school count (thank you!), QSI no longer has schools accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools as all accreditation is now done through the Middle states Association of Colleges and Schools Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools (MSA CESS), nor is the name of the school in Sarajevo the 'Sarajevo International School', but rather the 'QSI International School of Sarajevo'. Also, in the opening paragraph Africa and the Middle East (or Arabian Peninsula if you prefer) are also neglected as locations in which QSI operates.

I did not want to make the changes myself because, as is obvious, I don't yet know all the rules.

Cheers and thanks for all the help! --Joshua-olson (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Economy Car Rentals page

Hi, I'm kinda new here and I am trying to go by the rules and everything, so I added some secondary references in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_Car_Rentals but I am not sure if they can be accepted as objective and official sources of reference. Please advise if there is a problem and what exactly that is, and if you have any better ideas to propose to fix the problem. Also may I ask how can I prove that the image in the site belongs to my employer and he has given me the right to upload it here? Thank you very much for your effords so far.

Balaviaris (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Removal of content, blanking on List of social bookmarking websites. (TW)

The links are closed service (connotea.org) or redirecting to the another website (faves.com). And I am sorry I fogot to write reasons. Thanks,

Speedy deletion declined: Himansh Kohli

Hello Bonadea. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Himansh Kohli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's a bit expanded on last time, and the sources are different. I'm not testing them for GNG, but it's different enough that it needs to go to AfD again. Sorry. . Thank you. GedUK  11:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Himansh Kohli and HHL

Bonadea, grammar errors if made by anyone, that can be changed even by you. I will also help you. But only thing I am asking you is not reverting the article saying irrelevant details have been put. The changes i made were definitely not irrelevant but only improved the article. Point out if any grammatical or spelling errors if I have made in my version. I will change it if you notify me. I did not intend to hurt you. Sorry.

Another reason I am shocked is its you who is asking for deletion of the article though you are aware that artcile of my version is not in any case vandalism.Lionbase1234 (talk) 08:30, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

You are great in fixing the language errors. so you go ahead to make those changes. But please do not remove both articles.Lionbase1234 (talk) 08:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniele Luciano Moskal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Promotional mug

I have started a discussion on talk page of the article and thank you for helping to improve the article by removing the spammy links and promotional text.Eldakin569 (talk) 07:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Thank you for deleting my page. I will never contribute to Wikipedia again. Eldakin569 (talk) 11:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Retagging speedy deletion requests

Hi there. Just so you're clear, when someone declines a speedy deletion request, as I did, you should not then retag it. What you should have done in this case was take it back to AfD, not retag it for CSD. As it happened, a different admin, Graeme Bartlett saw the second request and actioned it. This is not how the process is supposed to work. Please don't retag again, unless the tag was removed by the article's creator. If it's been actively declined (usually by an admin), then that's the end of the CSD process. Thanks. GedUK  12:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey Ged - point taken, but just for the record, I didn't actually retag the page. The sequence of events was 1) the previously AfD-deleted page was recreated, 2) I tagged it, 3) you removed the tag and 4) Graeme Bartlett deleted it (without me having retagged it - if it was CSD tagged when Graeme deleted, that was done by someone else). Then 5) the page was recreated yet again by the same user, and 6) I tagged that second recreation (and I believe Graeme was the one to delete it again). This may still have been officious of me, and I have now removed the page from my watchlist so as not to get involved with the topic again. When the article was deleted in AfD it had been created by a slightly obnoxious sockpuppet, so I may have overreacted. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Ahh, I see, you retagged it after it had already been deleted and then remade. No, that's a very different situation, I think I misread the log. PLease ignore my message! :) GedUK  11:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Huh, what? Who said that? What message? Where? ;-) Cheers, bonadea contributions talk 14:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

PrivetVIP

hello! thank you very, I created a page for "PrivetVIP.com" and then put a link in "comparison of online dating websites". Actually what is wrong with my PrivetVIP.com page ? is it too short? or should I add more links? Thanks for your help. Jessica — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessica34310 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

This user has been blocked as a promotional account - the article in question was deleted as pure promotion. --bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dr.Rajesh Kotecha

Hello Bonadea. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dr.Rajesh Kotecha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The awards section is enough for A7; they're credible and sourced as well. He'll probably fail the GNG, but that needs to go to AfD to be tested. . Thank you. GedUK  11:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bonadea. You have new messages at Dharmadhyaksha's talk page.
Message added 13:00, 26 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:00, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey There

Just started in here and already my first edit was removed :) Will need to read & learn if I did something wrong in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shopping

confusing...28^ "Nielsen Global Online Shopping Report". Blog.nielsen.com. 2010-06-29. Retrieved 2012-01-19. was out of date information and also same kind of blog I linked my 29. link or should i have linked directly to that CBS News video? 


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Laaksoar (talk • contribs) 14:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

Shark7GB

Hi Bonadea, I included podcasting on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_advertising#Types_of_Internet_marketing because it's an important type of internet marketing strategy and it was not included on the list. Here's the original message:  Podcasting: This type of digital marketing refers to distributing content via audio and video files. In today's mobile-reliant world, podcasting has become an integral part of content marketing.[13]

The sentence was linked back to a blog post about podcasting. Please let me know why it was removed. Thank you very much!

Hi, I have read the guideline of external link in wikipedia section. I do not think it is a spam link, it provides relevant and useful resources to the reader. Do you think I can add them back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.221.214 (talk) 02:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

As I said on your talk page, I can't comment on the specific link as I don't know which link you are referring to (you didn't add it using this IP). But I suspect I would not agree with you that it is a useful resource, or I would not have removed it... you can always get second opinions from other editors, of course. --bonadea contributions talk 10:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea/Archive_13&oldid=713347531"