User talk:Bolton Percy

If I'm Not Responding it's probably Because

It is approximately 4:48 AM where this user lives (England). [refresh]

Welcome!

Hello, Bolton Percy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Bolton Percy (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind explaining...

...Why you listed Transdev York as running an #11A route and First York's #6 as passing by Clifton and York Hospital? The Transdev York page makes no mention of future changes (even on their news page), and the First York page only says "via city centre." Wikipedia does not accept original research, so you need to cite reliable sources (in this case, the bus company's own schedules). Ian.thomson (talk) 20:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is to make it more complex for the 6 and the 11A/13A/16A are new Sunday routes that replace the 112/113 it is all on the I Travel Site (York) http://www.itravelyork.info/events/changes-to-sunday-bus-services Bolton Percy (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC) Also i dont understand First York Site as it is a Hospital Service so they is a page for it and view timetable for 6 Bolton Percy (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Replay to any comments in 15 mins at 21:20 (UK Time) Bolton Percy (talk) 21:04, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notification

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh24B. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even view the site? Bolton Percy (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh24B/Archive. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. In English, "Archive" means "a collection of historical records." In other words, closed discussions that new material is not added to. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are correct I even gave you the site(s) Bolton Percy (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josh24B/Archive, you may be blocked from editing. Archives are past and closed discussions. You know what "archive" means, don't be a disruptive editor. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I was just making a Valid point. Bolton Percy (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly making your point in the wrong place. A sockpuppet discussion has no interest in wether an edit is valid. Sach an edit has even less validity in an archived sockpuppet discussion. I can't image anyon ebutht esockpuppet would bother. Meters (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]