Jump to content

User talk:Bolt Kjerag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Bolt Kjerag! I noticed your contributions to 2024 Venezuelan presidential election and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! NoonIcarus (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

[edit]

Hello! I removed your edits because some of the paragraphs were not sourced. If you are still intending to restore them please insert refs or merge them into your last paragraph that was sourced. Thanks. Borgenland (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph

[edit]

I have given the reference, it is inserted in there, Ref number 157, Dawn News, and highlighted the importance of the information that is accurately stated. What is wrong? Article: https://www.dawn.com/live/elections-2024#1813893

Title: Barrister Gohar Khan shares details of NA seats "won by PTI".

Published today, 13 February 2024 / 8 hours ago.

Scroll down the link provided .

What can I do ?

Bolt Kjerag Bolt Kjerag (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral Fraud Page

[edit]

Hi, your sources and claims are generally okay but for the snatching of identity cards, I couldn’t see anything about that in the source. If you have any reliable source that claims this, you are more than free to re-insert it. (Also, I can’t seem to add a topic on the Electoral Fraud page, any idea why?) VirtualVagabond (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been banned from editing Wikipedia indefinitely,1 minute after answering a complaint of editor Bogenland.
The explanatory letter was posted at Administrator Noticeboard/Incidents at 20:57, 20 February, 2024 and can be accessed through the Edit History page section (clock icon).
I give many suggestions of new sections to greatly improve the page and the reasons behind it.
Bolt Kjerag
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Bolt Kjerag (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral Fraud Page (2)

[edit]

Hi, I’ve also removed a chunk of your writing because I legitimately have no idea what it’s trying to say. If you want to write something, please write it in a manner that we have some sort of clue of what your point is, and I will try to copyedit it for your sake. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Johnuniq (talk) 01:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I posted my answer on 20:57 20 February 2024 on the Administrator noticeboard. It was deleted after 1 or 2 minutes and I have been blocked indefinitely. The text can be accessed on the page history. Bolt Kjerag (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Election Fraud Page (3)

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. ''Flux55'' (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents
I gave a answer on Wikipedia administrator board (new topic) but about after about 2 minutes the text was deleted and I have been blocked to edit Wikipedia indefinitely. I just gave an well thought answer to people that challenged my edits.
Bolt Kjerag Bolt Kjerag (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I posted it 20:57 / 20 February 2924. Please read my arguments. Poorly sourced? Bolt Kjerag (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Durceu Mag?

[edit]

Just a question? ''Flux55'' (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would have helped if Flux55 had spelled the master's name right (took me a lot longer to figure out), but it was nonetheless a good catch, and I have now tagged this account as a sock of Dirceu Mag. I'm noting this just in case Bolt requests an unblock.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]