User talk:Bollywood junction

December 2015

Hello, I'm NitRav. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jodha Akbar (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NitRav (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content and copyright violation

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sajid Nadiadwala, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Additionally, the content you added looks like it was copied from other sources. I see this 2012 Facebook post and this 2006 Times of India article for example. You may not copy content from other sources like this. Plagiarism is academically dishonest and lazy, and if you do it again, I will suspend your editing privileges without further notice. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood junction, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bollywood junction! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

December 2015

Your addition to Sajid Nadiadwala has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] Content added in this edit can be found verbatim here and here, and I'm sure from other sources. I have a low tolerance for copyright violations. If you submit content again that's lifted from other sources, I will suspend your editing privileges. As previously noted, what you are doing is academically dishonest and lazy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Divya Bharti, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Managerarc™^talk 18:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not a reliable source for this kind of information. See Wikipedia:Citing IMDb.- Managerarc™^talk 06:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Divya Bharti image

You have labeled the image as your "own work", whereas in reality it is a copyrighted image and will soon be deleted. See WP:UPIMAGE for details on what kind of images are acceptable on Wikipedia.- Managerarc™^talk 06:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank u I'll definitely do something about it.

Re: Divya Bharti's image

Wikipedia only accepts images that have been released by the copyright holder under an acceptable free license. Most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted and therefore can't be uploaded unless the copyright holder releases them under a free license. See Wikipedia:Image use policy for more details. If you have any more questions, just type {{Help me}} then your question on your talk page, a volunteer will soon assist you.- Managerarc™^talk 13:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 10:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPOILER and WP:NOTCENSORED

Hi there, re: this, your threat-laden removal of content is not constructive. Encyclopedias are expected to present comprehensive information about a subject, and in the context of a film, that would include summarising its entire plot. See WP:SPOILER and WP:NOTCENSORED. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this, if you remove this content again, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I hope you don't think I was fooled by this edit, do you? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be rude cyphoidbomb

Arbitrary cast reordering

Please don't arbitrarily reorder cast as you've done here. This looks like you're only entertaining your personal favorites, as opposed to ordering by some logical, producer-defined means. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop arbitrarily reordering cast as you've done again here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning about this. The next time you reorder cast without providing a rational explanation, your editing privileges will be interrupted. We're not here to entertain your personal preferences or cast favorites. Cast should be organised by producer preference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read more carefully.

This edit of yours is not constructive. The current reference says fairly clearly that the film had grossed 170 crore at the time the article was written and that it was potentially heading toward 200 crore. Please read more carefully in the future, as this sort of change is indistinugishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mersal (film)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mersal (film) . Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize , as you did at User talk:Universal Hero. Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do?? Bollywood junction (talk) 12:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link has been corrected.Don't mess with t/p of other people.Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 06:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bollywood junction. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bollywood junction. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]