User talk:Bollywood-Turk

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bollywood-Turk! I am Aaroncrick and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 09:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP

Are you 91. ? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 07:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not.--Bollywood-Turk (talk) 10:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you are or not, Filmfare awards is the most prominent award function in India along with NFA. In comparison to these to awards, the state awards are a joke. I cited sources for Filmfare being such. Can you cite ones for the State Awards? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the fact that spotection only stops new accounts for a few days. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 01:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know already. thanks. --Bollywood-Turk (talk) 08:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But don't be so happy, nobody will let you implement your POV on the article. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who cares, what you think. WP has its own policies, which I intent to follow. --Bollywood-Turk (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny that you are so aware of policies and everything related to WP, when you are only a new user. It was already noted on the talk, and I'll request a check on you. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A.R. Rahman

the reference to filmfare awards in rahman's article is "too controversial for the lead"??? there's mention of his oscar wins but not filmfare awards, which he has been winning ever since he started creating music, and which are among the most important awards in india, if not the most??? aint that h-y-p-o-c-r-i-s-y???

March 2009

I have removed your bad faith unblock request. Your tone and use of capital letters in requesting unblock do not give out a very good impression to any potential unblocker. Thus I have removed your request to offer you another chance at producing a more civil, well reasoned argument as to why you should be unblocked. Please read WP:UNBLOCK, for further details. CUTKD (talk) 11:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pure bad faith block, and nobody seems to care about this? --Bollywood-Turk (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bollywood-Turk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of Ultramegasuperstar, I'm just from the same location. His IP in Talk:A. R. Rahman was the reason, why I joined the discussion. I think UMS is a nice person, like any viennese people, but got hammered by YellowMonkeys indefinite page protection, which I considered extremely biased. So for the record again: I'm not Ultramegasuperstar, but I support his view on this issue, and I'm convinced, that YellowMonkey has caused alot of tension by protecting the page against IP's and helping so User:Shshshsh's agenda to establish sources violating WP:IS. --Bollywood-Turk (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests that attack others are not granted. At any rate, it appears very likely that you are a sock- or meatpuppet of Ultramegasuperstar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Sandstein 12:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bollywood-Turk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why this should be "very likely"? There is no attack on any user in my unblock request. It's an explanation why I joined the discussion. If you review my unblock request, do it right. --Bollywood-Turk (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Further incivility is not helping you. Anyway, your early edits make it blatantly obvious this is not your first account. Given your focus on Ultramegasuperstar's block and treatment and his edit war, I think the conclusion is correct. But even if you are someone elses sockpuppet, this is still obviously a sockpuppet account being used to join an edit war and for other disruption. Mango juice^talk 14:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.