User talk:Bolegash

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Hamtechperson. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 19:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Zhang He. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ham tech person 19:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Hamtechperson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ham tech person 19:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Hamtechperson. Ham tech person 19:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly warning

I'm not sure of the context, but you seem to be making a lot of accusations against other users, accusations which are not kind or true, in your defense of a blocked user who has behaved badly. If you want to defend that user, you'll do so more effectively if you speak politely, without exaggeration or rudeness. It might be a good idea for you to pause, take a few deep, calm breaths, and ask yourself: "What is my goal? Are my current actions likely to lead to my goal?" It might be an even better idea for you to pause, take a few deep, calm breaths, and disengage with this argument, either by spending some time making the encyclopedia better or by stepping away from the computer until you feel less angry. I would hate for you to be blocked, even temporarily, for words that you might come to regret tomorrow. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh,im shaking in my boots! you are trying to act so self righteouos,and at the same time threatening me with your power.Bolegash (talk) 23:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for repeated violations of WP:CIVIL, after several warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you feel this way, and I hope you'll be able to interact with other users more politely tomorrow. For now, though, I think it's necessary to prevent you from continuing to make uncivil edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Polite"?! Hah! I've been politee,and continue to be,I point out a problem with an admin,and you people become irrational.Bolegash (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it's not true that you think you've been polite, because if you honestly don't know how to be polite, then it's inevitable that you'll have this problem again, and that the next block will be longer. I hope, though, that you're just exaggerating because you feel strongly, and that really you do know how to be polite, and will be polite tomorrow. To help, I won't make you angrier by engaging in any argument here on your talk page; this is the last edit you'll see here from me, and I hope that none of the users you've disagreed with will continue the disagreement here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was polite to you. See,you're still trying to use power to try to frighten me! Bolegash (talk) 23:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC) So predictable. Bolegash (talk) 23:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone self righteous for giving advice on how not to be blocked is not polite. Here's a thought: take a break and come back and re-read other's posts with your name on them, and read your posts with someone else's name on them. Do things seem different? Or try describing what has gone on here to someone else, but switch positions: state that you were the one who was greeted with a message of "Are you wrong in the head" by some other editor, who claimed to be polite while calling the blocking admin self-righteous. Who does that person sympathize with? Ian.thomson (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alizee

I could listen to the record and think this is the iconic definition of synthpop and it doesn't mean a thing in the context of editing a Wikipedia article. Her Website and Itunes are considered personal and promotional websites. What they state may be 100% correct but Wikipedia policy does not consider these type of sites "reliable" and they are not allowed to be used. [1] This link goes to a basic outline of the concepts of verifiability and reliable sources with further links to more detailed explanations. RTL seems like a reliable source. I would use that. Feel free to ask any questions Edkollin (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DDR national anthem.ogg

As you removed your post on my talk page I assume you figured out where the deletion discussion was and what is happening? :) If not please let me know. --Errant ^(chat!) 22:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article

Since you mentioned the Republic of China in your user page, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.36 (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SCHUTZPOLIZEI GDR.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SCHUTZPOLIZEI GDR.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. eh bien mon prince (talk) 03:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

MfD nomination of User:Bolegash/Lenin

User:Bolegash/Lenin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bolegash/Lenin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bolegash/Lenin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sundostund (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]