User talk:Bold Clone/Archive 1

Why do you have a problem diferntiating between artifacts and other things on Warehouse 13 page?

Makuta (Phantoka)

In the Makuta (Phantoka) article, please stop deleting the info on the Phantoka's swamp counterparts, as the article is about both groups. The swamp team isn't mentioned in the title yet only because we don't know their name. Drakhan (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same Bold clone from BS01? User:Kazi22 8 March

Yeah, it's me. You the same Kazi22? --Bold Clone (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SI SI SI!! It's Me!! Whatchu doin here? -Kazi22 _Talk 26 March 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 03:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just watching the BIONICLE section. --Bold Clone (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool with a dead Carapar? Besides you know how this site is. -Kazi22 _Talk 27 March 2008

Eh...I kinda liked him. --Bold Clone (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing is me and Seb are recovering well. -Kazi22 _Talk 3 April 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 22:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

I want to question this edit in the article Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. There was a good reason to include that quote box, because Humphries' interpretation of the fourth seal is based on that particular translation, which is different compared to most other translations.

You can re-add it if you want. --Bold Clone (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove plot

Please do not remove plot from fictional character writeups. Mathewignash (talk) 14:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The plot is leaked from the movie, right? Then it shouldn't be up since the movie isn't out. --Bold Clone (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is no "leak", it's the novel and comic book versions of the story. Mathewignash (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it's still movie spoilers, as the book and comic tell you everything in the movie. The info shouldn't be up there. --Bold Clone (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the link to Flugabwehrkanonenpanzer Gepard

The Energon Kickback mold used to make Landquake is indeed based on the Flugabwehrkanonenpanzer Gepard anti-aircraft tank. Mathewignash (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Bionicle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tresiden (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mathewignash (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Mathewignash (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some reason you seem to come in and start vandalizing information on this single Transformers article in the last few weeks? Do you plan on deleting information on every TF page on Wikipedia, or is this one special to you for some reason? Anyways, I put your suggested change up on the Transformers Wiki Project page. Please participate in that talk instead of deleting information on a page at your whim. Mathewignash (talk) 17:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's special 'cause you're vandalizing the page. At least I think...Check the Landquake page. --Bold Clone (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - toy line

Please refrain from repeatedly deleting important information on this article. You will be blocked if you continue to do so. Areaseven (talk) 23:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit dispute on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Hi. I'm writing this to all frequent contributors to the article on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. It happens that there's this guy BIGNOLE, who was the one who intended to replace the plot with a pamphlet-like overview of the movie. Well now he has popped again, deciding that random information has to be removed (namely the appearance of Frenzy's head, and the appearance of a Buffalo mine-sweeping vehicle -Bonecrusher's alt mode in the 2007 movie- among the Decepticons in Egypt). This guy first removed both of these calling WP:OR on them, but has changed the story several times in the course of the discussion. My main concern with him is that he doesn't even know what he's talking about. He doesn't know the characters, and has shown to ignore major background plot points about the story, so it really bugs me him popping in whenever he likes and chopping off the info he doesn't regard as important just because he is on Wikipedia:Wikiproject Films. Please take a look at the discussion and make yourself heard. It's kinda tiresome being the only one who seems to care, seeing as people discuss around, but just sit and watch whenever there's real decissions to be made. I won't care if you end up taking sides against me. Make yourself heard. uKER (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi, Bold Clone! I don't know if you are doing this on purpose or if something weird is going on, but when you edit, random parts of urls are deleted. If you are doing this on purpose, definitely cut it out. If its something wrong that you are not causing, it might be useful to search for some administrators to ask about fixing the problem. BOVINEBOY2008

Sorry. It's a glitch on my computer. It simply takes out parts of words. I've checked around, and I still can't find out if it's a problem with my computer, my computer model, my internet, or what else. I apologize for any URLs I've messed up and will try harder to avoid that in the future. --Bold Clone (talk) 16:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, its cool. Just making sure you were aware of it. BOVINEBOY2008 02:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Our dispute

We should get administrators to look at our dispute and decide whetheer the info should be left or not so as to not get in trouble The Movie Master 1 (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Fine. --Bold Clone (talk) 15:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked User Acalamari to look at our edits and help us make a decision The Movie Master 1 (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Bold Clone (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We need to work it out on the talk page The Movie Master 1 (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Bold Clone (talk) 14:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spurious edits to Power_ring_(DC_Comics)

Did you ever figure out what is causing your PC to delete parts of stuff? Looks like you may have some sort of puritanical infection. ;) On 3 March 2010, during one of your large edits to this article, the words " al" and " ist" were altered, with " " and " " replaced by spaces. I happened to notice those today, and WikiBlame traced it to your edit. I doubt it was intentional, as it seemed to happen along with all of the stuff you added and changed, in sections you didn't even work on. Perhaps you should do a thorough malware scan of your system, as it seems to be blanking out words that offend it. Good luck! Rassilon (talk) 06:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've figured out that whatever is doing it is within the programming of the computer itself, so I can't simply upgrade the system or something. I'm planning to do a thorough scan of my computer to find out which specific part is causeing the the prolem, so until then, I'm just going to avoid the power rings page. --Bold Clone (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2012 and beyond in film

How about you go to the talk page and explain why all of that should be added to the article? If you can't explain it, don't add it.-5- (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain it, I posted on the talk page. Your post on the talk page still doesn't explain why it should be added. Your little retort on my talk page just repeated what I said, and is not amusing in the least.-5- (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is that "better safe than sorry." That makes no sense at all. The safe approach would be to not list them at all, then wait for a confirmed date.-5- (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The whole point is that we don't know that. That is why they are "tentative" dates, meaning uncertain, unsure, not positive, etc.-5- (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And if we are not certain of information, we don't add it to the article, per Wikipedia:Crystal.-5- (talk) 00:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The key word is "tentative." The fact that the dates are tentative by their very definition implies that even the studio is not sure that the films will come out at that time.-5- (talk) 00:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, but are you and User:TheLastAmigo the same person?-5- (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Threatening

I am not "threatening you with beauracracy", I am notifying you that your behavior is incompatible with the aims of Wikipedia. Constantly edit warring despite a rough talk page consensus against your edits is disruptive, and disruptive editors that violate WP:3RR are blocked to prevent further disruption. As such, you've been reported for edit warring here. - Sudo Ghost 15:16, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Power ring (DC Comics)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Power ring (DC Comics). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Bold Clone reported by User:SudoGhost (Result: 31h). EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spurious deletions on Helena G. Wells article

Please stop the spurious deletions from the Helena G. Wells article. The haphazard actions you have taken appear to be vandalism. Electprogeny (talk) 02:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an inappropriate warning. The edits were clearly an effort by the editor to reduce the amount of in-universe information in the article. They certainly weren't "spurious" as the editor included an appropriate edit summary with his first edit.[1] --AussieLegend (talk) 03:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was not inappropriate as the page had already had the in-universe information edited. If you look at the edits then you will see that BoldClone simply deleted information. It was not a helpful edit but instead was vandalism. --Mynameisme91 (talk) 03:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The warning most definitely was inappropriate because the edits were neither spurious nor vandalism. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thirteen (Transformers), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history at A.K.A. Jessica Jones shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Seems you have a knack for edit warring, looking at your talk page. Alex|The|Whovian 02:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Alex|The|Whovian 02:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enough. If I see one more revert from both of you, I will block you both. Now talk it out on the talk page. If you want my opinion, "New Series Prologue" is not a title as per WP:TITLE, it has no title and it is just a moniker to refer to it; therefor no quotes. It is also not a prologue to the episode, but the entire series. Now go work it out. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 07:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]