User talk:BoharCD

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Princeneil (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BoharCD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey Admin why I got blocked? As I were only searching for the topics related to wireless communication and mathematics for improvements and editing only as suggested by TheOriginalSoni(User talk:TheOriginalSoni), you should recheck my history or contributions, I didn't violate any Wiki policy and my account is not sock puppet of any one. Can I get unblocked please BoharCD (talk) 19:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. This is a checkuser verified sock. Kuru (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, you are leaving Wikipedia, you say? So, you will not create any more accounts, you say? Surprise surprise, that is no more true now than it was any of the other times you said that. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]