User talk:Bodysana
Welcome!
[edit]
|
| This is Bodysana's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mutanome has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Individualized cancer immunotherapy has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 03:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of BioNTech
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on BioNTech, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of sec.report/Document/0001193125-19-241112. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSS 💬 04:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of BioNTech
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on BioNTech, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://sec.report/Document/0001193125-19-241112/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at BioNTech, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The next time you post persistent spam or copyright violations here, I will block you Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Hi, first let me say that however reputable, large or important a company is, that doesn't give it a right to have an article here, text must comply with our rules. I saw that you have made other contributions, which is why I didn't block you as a possible undeclared paid editor, but writing about a company is fraught with difficulties, not least because many attempts are made by the companies themselves.
- You may be misunderstanding copyright, the fact that a document is publicly available doesn't make it free to copy. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by the organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked © 2019 SEC.report . We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. We use a tool to check for copied text, but it can't run on deleted articles.
- You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or interviewing its management. The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
- significant coverage in
- independent,
- multiple,
- reliable,
- secondary sources.
- Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. You tell us very little about the company itself. You say it has 1000 employees, but your source doesn't verify that, and you say nothing about turnover or profits. Your main text doesn't even say where it's based until near the end
- You wander off the subject with stuff like BioNTech is developing next-generation antibodies (checkpoint immunomodulators, targeted cancer antibodies, bispecific antibodies in collaboration with Genmab).[26][29][30][31][32][33][26][29] What we need is one ref to verify that statement, what we get is a bucket of primary sources on the research itself, which isn't relevant to a company article, and primary sources shouldn't be used anyway for writing about research.
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. DuoBody® looks like what companies write - it's not our job to protect their registered marks. I think the whole thing reads as a promo because so much is this is what we do rather than this is what we are
It's not the worse I've seen, and I'd normally restore as a draft for improvement. We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations, which is a problem here.
OK, I've just run the tool again, and the copyright violation score on the last version is 71%, too high to restore as a draft Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)