User talk:Bodmanlaw

September 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bodman PLC. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bodmanlaw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am taking over this page for the employee, now departed, who used to maintain this page. I understand the issues involved in the blocking decision and at this time simply wish up udate some outdated and inaccurate information in the description of our company. I will refrain from adding promotional statements.

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick a new username. And we aren't interested in unblocking you if this is your intention. If you plan to write about subject areas where you don't have a conflict of interest, tell us what those are. Yamla (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, your response sounds as if this account was accessed by more than one person, which was never allowed. Accounts can never be shared amongst two or more people; an account must be accessed by one person - the same person - for its entire lifetime. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]