User talk:Bobfreshwater

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bobfreshwater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging UCHSC with University of Colorado Denver

Sounds like a good idea to me! Your edits and photos look great. Denverjeffrey (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nomination of University of Colorado Denver

'Reviewer -- Nascar 1996'

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
The article has very good language in it. Nascar 1996 00:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance:
The style of this article matches all the rules. Nascar 1996 00:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
The references are accurate and completely describes the topic. Nascar 1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
The article is good here.Nascar 1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
The references are probably very hard to find. Nascar 1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Good here. Nascar 1996 00:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
The information is mostly about the topic. Nascar 1996 00:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
I didn't see anything wrong with the article here. Nascar 1996 00:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
The article looks good in this stand point. Nascar 1996 00:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
One image does not have the fair use rationale. Nascar 1996 00:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
The images in the article are placed appropriately where they should be.The captions are really good, too. Nascar 1996 00:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
The article is very good, but it can be better. Nascar 1996 00:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to add it to all the appropriate topic. Thank You. Nascar 1996 00:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90% certainty

Hi Bob. IPCC AR4 says on one page that it is "very likely" humans are the main cause of GW. They use this and other expressions of certainty throughout the document, and provided a definition. We cite the page where they say it is "very likely" humans are the cause, and also a page with a summary of their definitions. In case you did not read those 4 refs at the end of the sentence, very likely is defined as being >90% certain based on a combination of statistical analysis combined with expert judgment. Maybe there is a "more scientific" way to communicate certainty, and maybe you know what it is. However, we are limited to what appears in the reliable sources, and IPCC's every-7-years climate science assessment reports have substantial weight. If you have alternative ways to talk about this in the article, with sources, please post your thoughts to the talk page. Have a happy, NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bobfreshwater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bobfreshwater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bobfreshwater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bobfreshwater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]