User talk:Bobbyfatus

Welcome!

Hello, Bobbyfatus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutrality^talk 16:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Your talk page postings here and here are unacceptable; they do not comply with policies and guidelines, specifically with Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines (in both cases) and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (in the former case). Please carefully review these pages and keep all talk-page comment focused on article improvement. Editors who consistently engage in unacceptable conduct, whether on an article or a talk page, risk having their editing privileges revoked. --Neutrality^talk 16:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are not protected by BLP. Good try protecting muslims tho, how about putitng your loved ones in a burqa.--Bobbyfatus (talk) 16:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP applies to all pages, not just article space. Read the policy. Continued unacceptable remarks (e.g., attacking other editors, casting aspersions) will likely lead to a block. Neutrality^talk 17:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If all you want to do is to blather on about how bad Muslims are, it has nothing to do with article improvement.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 17:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah and the agenda shines through. Go fuck yourself, Dhimmi.--Bobbyfatus (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I've imposed the block because of your personal attacks, crude, BLP-violating talk page comments, and apparent unwillingness or inability to learn or understand community norms. If you, at some future point, commit to actually following policy, then myself or another admin will restore your editing privileges. Until then, however, the encyclopedia is not obligated to countenance this behavior. Neutrality^talk 18:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobbyfatus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Neutrality has a history of pov blocking. I've only gone against wikipedia rules twice and it's a three strikes policy here. Neutrality -- ironic name btw-- should be desysopped and all my editing privilege restored.--Bobbyfatus (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, we don't have to let you disrupt Wikipedia thrice before we can put a stop to it. See also WP:NOTTHEM. Huon (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.