User talk:Bobby Kwan

October 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Race (human categorization). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocrite. You started it by boxing the discussion. Reported here [1] Bobby Kwan (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent abuse towards other editors and edit-warring. New account, editing on this article only, the second one to follow that modus operandi in recent months..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby Kwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have to be kidding. This editor starts out by boxing up my comment before anyone could respond. I notified him of a report on his talk page which he removed with "fuck off" in the edit summary. He accuses me of forum style comments, when my comment was objecting to exactly that. And now you accuse me of incivility? Is this guy your buddy or something? Comment at 3RR: "New, contentious user (Bobby Kwan) with edit summaries like "Why are you so utterly obnoxious?" versus established, productive user (MPants). This one should be closed soon.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)" In response to "fuck off" in an edit summary? Are you people for real? Double standards for the regulars I see. Provocation, punish the reaction. Sick. Bobby Kwan (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests that talk about the behavior of others are not considered; you were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. I am declining your request, and due to your personal attack below, I am removing talk page access. You will need to use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 15:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

14:49, 8 October 2018 Black Kite (talk | contribs) blocked Bobby Kwan (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia)

You disgusting person. My original comment was exactly that, an attempted contribution. This was boxed off, I was abused and accused of what I was objecting to, now I'm banned for incivility for calling someone "obnoxious" after they told me to "fuck off". You people are utterly twisted. Bobby Kwan (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 15:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bobby Kwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22894 was submitted on Oct 08, 2018 16:15:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]