User talk:Bobby1200

August 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Compton, California, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Soulja Slim, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Magnolia Projects. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffries East Projects for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffries East Projects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffries East Projects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Desire Projects.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Desire Projects.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Thomasville.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Thomasville.jpeg, which you've attributed to https://closingofatlantapublichousingprojects.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/hello-world/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby1200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Diannaa i am a new Wikipedia editor and have been blocked for sock puppet i have also created a few articles but they where deleted because of the Sock puppetry. please help

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby1200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware that i have been blocked for sock puppet. I have engaged in reverting a few edits and as a new user i will not continue to cause damage or disrupt any more articles. My old account was also blocked for reasons i cant remember so i have created a new account to start fresh. I have read Wikipedia guidelines and now have a better understanding of sock puppet.

Decline reason:

Block evasion. Clearly your understanding of sock puppetry is defective. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were also blocked for copyright violations. Pretty much all of your edits had to be removed because the material you added was copied from elsewhere online. Your unblock request does not address this problem. Did you edit as Algchris? That account was blocked for copyright violations also, and has many interests in common with you and uploaded an identical photo. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I only have two accounts my last account was codo2411 which was blocked. If i did add any copyrighted material my apologies, i just started Wikipedia two months ago so i'm pretty new to it. I was never warned about it so i didn't know if it was copyrighted. I did uploaded a couple of photos and created two articles before i was blocked.

You also have used an accpount Tenog504. What it appears you fail to realize it that the block applies to you, personally, and not just to any specific account name. Creating another account, such as this one, while blocked is block evasion and this is automatically b;lockable. To edit you will need to apply for an unblock at your primary account; when doing so you must also mention the names of other accounts which you have used. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]