User talk:Bobble hobble dobble

Welcome!

Hello, Bobble hobble dobble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —Scouter Sig 23:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheila Rodwell

A tag has been placed on Sheila Rodwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:27, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sheila Rodwell

I have nominated Sheila Rodwell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Rodwell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Edward Barnsley OBE FCA (1st September 1919 - 31st August 1992) was a british businessman. He was Managing Director, Tube Investments 1974–1982 and Director, H.P. Bulmer Holdings, 1980–1987. He was the son of Alfred E. Barnsley and Ada F. Nightingale. He married Margaret Gwyneth Llewellin, they had one son and a daughter, Victoria Barnsley. He was awarded OBE in 1975. During the Second World War he was a member of the Friends' Ambulance Unit.

Proposed deletion of Thomas Barnsley

The article Thomas Barnsley has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Endofskull (talk) 04:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He's pretty clearly dead. Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did I forget to lol at you lots? Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contested changes

Hi, if you make a change and somebody reverts it, it's usually best to discuss it rather than just making the change again.

The naming of former pupils' categories has been DEEPLY contentious - see this HUGE and inconclusive discussion for many of the issues and these three smaller ones which each struck out the "Old Fooians" form. (See also this one which removed similar forms from several Australian schools categories.) Any further proposed change should be run through the category discussion process before making it. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, yes, good point. Thanks for reverting. You seem awfully committed and intent on not trying to use the most logical system. I hope the small victory makes you proud. btw, "Deeply contentious" largely just to you it seems? I'm not too bothered either way; it just wanted to use the logical system and keep it consistent with the other public school articles. The Old Edwardians discussion is a red herring as it discusses three with the same name, which is clearly not the case here. The Australian schools category appears to be a slightly larger victory for this bizarre view of yours, (I think it is telling that although you agree that the most logical system should not be used, you can't decide on what should be used instead (and indeed the plural of person is persons, not people), but I think we can take some heart in the fact that the big battle appears to be a draw. Keep up the crusade - you might win this bizarre crusade of yours. Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing bizarre about preferring category names that say to all what they are over what is largely internal jargon - and you will see many others in the debate with similar views. I am flexible on the precise form because of the differing opinions on using terms like "pupils", "students" and "alumni" but that does not detract from the central point of not using the obscure terms. And "people" is the standard plural, "persons" is largely restricted to formal legal contexts and hypercorrection pedantry. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prince William, Duke of Cambridge

All you had to do was provide the evidence in the form of a reference. Why do you call others breathtakingly stupid? Are you some kind of toff who does nothing else but thinks about this stuff? Nasnema Chat 18:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting that your name spellchecks to nastiness. Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was nausea. The fact is that you should provide references to any claim you make regardless of how OBVIOUS it might be. Nasnema Chat 21:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. What happened was I corrected a statement that was false. You then undid that because you were unknowledgeable about the subject and too incompetent to check your facts before reverting. An apology would be nice. Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cecil Kaye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to CIE and CSI

Cecil William Kaye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to William Barber

John Winfield Bonser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to PC

Julius Hare (artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Conway

Philip Evans (headmaster) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to FRSC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Archibald Venn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to JP, FSA and CMG

Walter Garstang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to FLS

Will Hurrell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to English

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sir Thomas Adams's Professor of Arabic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Palmer, Charles Wright and William Craven

Nicholas P. Clegg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dutch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 17:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]