User talk:Boab
Nice to see beautiful Freddie Image
[edit]I am GLAD to see that we have a beautiful Freddie image. I will have to work some more on this page now!Boab (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
I fixed the Articles for deletion nomination for the page. This was actually the third nomination and can now be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Schneider (writer) (3rd nomination). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you have done by continuing to add unreliable information to Snopes.com, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 02:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Funny to watch Jim in Georgia accuse me of "vandalizing" Wikipedia. In what way? What exactly did I do? Because I added a sentence along with seven (non-blog) references? Do you also want to send me to Siberia, Jim in Georgia?Boab (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Snopes.com. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Boab. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ian.thomson (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alex Jones (radio host). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
PA
[edit]Please do not accuse other users of bias or assume bad faith. it is against policy and can lead to bansSlatersteven (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
I have not accused you of bias, not assumed bad faith. If I have kindly provide the quote or withdraw the accusation.Slatersteven (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Try reading the four sources for the "conspiracy theorist" you claim was not sourced. Please do not claim sourced material is unsourced.Slatersteven (talk) 00:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
ani
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)