User talk:Bnotepr

Bnotepr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bnotepr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 15:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

st170e^talk 15:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 16:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

st170e^talk 16:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are several new sources. Can you please check?? Thanks in advance Bnotepr (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at Phantomsteve's talk page.
Message added 11:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Spamming user talk pages

Don't randomly post to a bunch of users' talk pages that you want them to look over your draft. If you do so again, you may be blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Bnotepr (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of the above. Canvassing is frowned upon. I'll just say that I can't see a credible claim that the article meets the notability guidelines for music. Although you gave references, many seemed to be self-editable, sales sites, blogs or websites of dubious provenance and credibility, and may not be adequate as independent verifiable sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got it and sorry. Thanks for the advice and your time Bnotepr (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards; Is ok if has to be deleted. Sorry for message a couple of Administrators almost the same message. The draft has more than 5 weeks and I was looking for help. If the article do not pass the criteria is ok to delete it, no hard feelings. I can start another draft from the scratch in the future, and sorry to bother each of you, sincerely Bnotepr (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cirex (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cirex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards. Can someone help me with the citations? Much appreciated! Bnotepr (talk) 08:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cirex has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cirex. Thanks! --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 17:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cirex (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

After deleting half of the draft for being copied directly from the artist's website, there isn't much there other than the name of the band.
The draft still has issues with too many irrelevant or unreliable sources.
See WP:MUSICBIO for more on the notability requirements for musicians. I do not think at this point Cirex meets them, but additional sources could demonstrate otherwise.
Finally, the draft is written in a promotional tone; it should be written in an encyclopedic tone (use Cirex or Ortz instead of Eric when referring to the artist).

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cirex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cirex

Hi. I have accepted the article, so it now should now be indexed by search engines and such. Cheers, --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 06:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]