User talk:Bmcstan

This is Bmcstan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebbucki (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to lack WP:SIGCOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebbucki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebbucki (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Liquipedia is not a reliable source, per WP:USERG. It is run by volunteers and edited by users, and should not be used on Wikipedia. There remains no proof he has been cited by reliable publications. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool to gain popularity.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebbucki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Liquipedia is not a reliable source. Can it be still be listed just for extra information? I used to edit his page on there which is why I'm submitting this. Could you tell me exactly what proof is considered reliable? The most recent article I found was from gamezo.co.uk but I'll try to keep looking. For example this page SmithZz only has two references. Could you tell me what makes that page eligible in comparison to my submission? I'm slightly unclear regarding the last comment. I'm not sure who uses Wikipedia as a promotional tool but I don't think this is going to make him any more popular. Thank you for any help. Bmcstan (talk) 10:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sebbucki

Hello, Bmcstan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebbucki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sebbucki

Hello, Bmcstan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sebbucki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]