User talk:Blythwood/2016/January

Archives

Scarrington

Thanks for the pics etc. Bmcln1 (talk) 19:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Blythwood. You have new messages at Benlisquare's talk page.
Message added 21:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--benlisquare_T•C•E 21:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My recent post you deleted without reasons

Dear Blywood,

This is laneos. I take issue with your deleting my recent post without giving specific reasons for the action. The information I gave is accurate.

I am an editor and it is quite inappropriate to censor someone simply because I'm your opinion it "seems" to have issues. What are your reasons? Please explain and if there is in fact something I need to fix I will do so.

Thanks.

Replied on your talk page. Blythwood (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Del Carmen

Hey dear blythwood please delete my article I can't find a way to correct that

Rashashank (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	thanks its my duty to make new articles tamil 13:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Orange Garden, Rome

Your edit of the photo does not make the picture clearer as it is now very small. On the Italian page it is a panorama but I am unsure how to set that up here. Thanks Roundtheworld (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Roundtheworld: - I can't remember what the policy is on this but I know it's preferred not to make a full-size image display on the English wiki as the header image for an article. See Castle Square, Warsaw and Piazza San Marco as examples of this. I think the problem is that setting a specific image size doesn't work for people viewing the article on unusual display sizes. Maybe put in another image (like the one on itwiki) as header and the large one lower down? St. Peter's Square article has a panorama and it's a good example of that - the header image is normal size. Blythwood (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fira Sans sample image.png as SVG

Hi Blythwood. Thanks for uploading File:Fira Sans sample image.png! Could you upload an SVG of it as well? --Moyogo/ (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Moyogo: Am looking into this! I'm finding it a bit complicated since the SVG packages I'm familiar with don't have great font handling. But will think about it. I've kept all the original files in order to do conversions in future. Blythwood (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to Wikipedia's dictionary

Some terms that are frequently used in references are underlined in red in Wikipedia, although they are correctly spelled. I specifically recall the words "casemate" and "redesignated". I've seen erroneous edits made to eliminate these words from articles. How can I submit words for addition to the Wikipedia internal dictionary? RobDuch (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Blythwood (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bertrand Badie

Hello Blythwood, thanks for your message. Regarding notability, a quick check on google scholar with his name gives me 6500 results. I think that, added to 20 book results on barns and nobles (http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/%22Bertrand%20badie%22?Ns=P_Sales_Rank&Ntk=P_key_Contributor_List&Ntx=mode%20matchall), it justifies by itself the article correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinko87 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A10 on Googoogaga

I declined your CSD tag. Note at WP:CSD: This deletion rationale should only be used rarely. In the vast majority of duplicate articles, the title used is a plausible misspelling or alternate name for the main article, and a redirect should be created instead. This criterion should only be used if its title could be speedy deleted as a redirect. →Σ σ ς. (Sigma) 22:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC) @Σ: - yes forgot that, sorry. I've added a message on the page creator's talk page explaining what's happened. Blythwood (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Dickenson-Auner

Thanks for the tip-off on the Bartok premiere! That had been a question mark in the back of my mind during the translation process. Cheers, Alafarge (talk) 22:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

West Indian Gazette

Thanks for your edit on West Indian Gazette adding the citations. Proscribe (talk) 10:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lactopontin

Thank you very much for your attention on Lactopontin. Its great to see people working and caring! I put the stub up at the request of another collaborator who is going to be adding a bunch of content to it soon (hopefully this weekend). Per your specific question, the name is not a trade or company name, but a name that is gaining preferred use in the scientific community for the particular protein secreted in milk, derived from SPP1. The protein is currently universally confused with the systemic protein Osteopontin derived from the same gene, but with a myriad of post-translational structure and physiologic functional differences. I've spoken with some of the researchers at UC Davis and UC Illinois who have agreed to add some of their most recent work that show why this is an important distinction. 17:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biotech5771 (talk • contribs)

Thank you!!!!

You are the best! I appreciate the work you do!

Ps. I saw your edit history. (force of habit when i encounter other users). Man, you are on alot. Thank you for the knowledge.

05:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winterysteppe (talk • contribs)

Monachus

All yours for the moment!

Peter Mercator (talk) 13:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A page you started (Giuseppe Concone) has been reviewed!

Thank you for helping fill it out. My practice is to bring anything over to Wikipedia which I find in my travels through old encyclopedias on Wikisource which seems notable and not already there. The New International Encyclopedia seems to be a particularly rich source, as is Appletons' Cyclopaedia of American Biography. Library Guy (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My article on Scan-A-Line is not promotional. It is an encyclopedic article about how that type of technology works.

Blythwood:

You have flagged my article on Scan-A-Line technology for deletion because you believe it to be promotional. It is not a promotional article, but an explanation of how a fascinating technology works. However, the following article on Kleenex fits your description of a post eligible for speedy deletion because it absolutely promotes a brand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleenex.

Somebody doing research on non-contact measurement and guiding technology will find my article most intriguing.

Additionally, you did not state the reason for your action. You said "for several reasons" but failed to mention even one. Your decision appears to be arbitrary. If you have additional questions, please contact me, I am more than willing to answer any questions you may have.

Best Regards,

TheRealDJMullen — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRealDJMullen (talk • contribs) 01:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for fixing my goof. It was late and I was typing on my iPad — a recipe for disaster. Tim D. Williamson^yakkety-yak 20:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JeffSessions edits

RE: User_talk:Timdwilliamson#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_User.2FTimdwilliamson.2FJeffSessions_edits

Thanks. I mistyped it when I was trying to create a user page. Used a "/" instead of the ":". Tim D. Williamson^yakkety-yak 17:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, ITC Benguiat is my favorite typeface. Tim D. Williamson^yakkety-yak —Preceding undated comment added 21:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	The new page Dennis Morin that I created is not coming up on the 1st page of Google search results. Why is that? And what to do for better results? Please suggest. SumanSingh121 (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Métaboles

Hello, Blythwood. You have new messages at Deskford's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Deskford (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

esyN page

Dear Blythwood

I am still in the process of updating the esyN page. To support the fact that esyN is a widely used resource I have mentioned the fact that its been used by large databased like flybase and flymine and Intermine and pombase to display their data (i.e. esyN is embedded in their websites and used to display their data!) These are quite large websites and I believe this should warrant the status of notable or not ? I have added a section called embedded where I have added these details. At the moment esyN is being used by roughy 16700 unique users per month according to google analytics - how do I make a proper reference to this data ? Should I use an image from google analytics ?

Also, I know of other research groups (unrelated to me) currently submitting manuscripts that use esyN - but these articles have not been published yet..

what do you suggest ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Favrin (talk • contribs) 15:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Blythwood (talk) 21:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fast work

Thanks for (very promptly) reviewing my article! -Darouet (talk) 08:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DPI Specialty Foods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DPI Specialty Foods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DPI Specialty Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bazj (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead End

Hello, Blythwood. Thanks for your review and notes on the new Dead End page. I appreciate your help and additions to the page. Currently, I am adding a link to the article, highlighting a revival at the Williamstown Theatre Festival in 1997. --> Squaredroot (talk), January 24 2016.

@Squaredroot: - great, thanks. I have made all the changes I'm going to make. Blythwood (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Saul

Thanks for the update. Would you complete the cleanup or do I have to add tags?

Page: Andrew Saul (Nutritionist)

Ananmallik1980 (talk) 12:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Garamond

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Garamond you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 07:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]