User talk:Blurrzuki

Re: Latin conjugation

Ahh, I recall that, yeah. If I remember right, the first edit was an enexplained blanking from an anonymous user (almost always reverted), but the second looked a lot more... good-faithy. The second one I would have not have reverted, except that the blanking had led me to believe you were a meanie. That one was a more iffy judgement call, so I hope you don't take offense to it. Anyway, I wish you nothing but luck. :) Thanks for taking the time to message me. Luna Santin 06:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latin conjugation

I personally feel you have made the tables a lot more confusing than they used to be. My preferred version (except for miinor mispellings) is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latin_conjugation&oldid=66012862. I think it is much better that everything be put into one table rather than a separate one for each tense.

The tables didn't really teach anything, though, and they aren't that in depth. These appendices in Wiktionary are more of what you're looking for. They're excellent if you need brushing up.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_first_conjugation

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_second_conjugation

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_third_conjugation

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_fourth_conjugation

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Conjugations

I thought that the article should be more explanatory and descriptive, rather than being a "guide" as it were. Unfortunately, all of the Romance languages' articles pertaining to conjugation are "guides," and look like Wiktionary appendices. In fact, the Wiktionary appendices are a lot better. Thanks for your concern, though. Please drop me another if you get anymore problems. --Blurrzuki 19:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lagunabeach3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lagunabeach3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi, Blurrzuki, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof.

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 08:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rockylaguna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rockylaguna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Roman-era mosaic.jpg

The file File:Roman-era mosaic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]