User talk:Blurred Lines/Archives/2013/Sep

Family Guy (season 12)

Sir/Madam, I thank you for your feedback on my recent edits on this article. I have redone my edit once more and have made it slightly different, as the reason for the format I was using is because I do not know how to make bullets on Wiki articles. - Posted by MrAGReddy 4 September 2013, 21:26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrAGReddy (talk • contribs) 03:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, man.

I didn't mean to cause any trouble, but I know what's in store for the upcoming seasons of The Simpsons, Family Guy and American Dad!. --StewieBaby05 (talk) 19:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

If you know what's in store of the articles you just listed, please add a reference. Without it, readers will not be able to know if it's true or not, that's why I've been sending you notices about it. I have already gave you a warning, you're last chance is the final warning if you add content without a reference again. So in order for you to not get in risk of being blocked, please the next time you add content, please add a reference, thank you. --Blurred Lines 19:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

you can go and ahead delete the boxart (that i uploaded) for Super Mario 3D World

you can go ahead and deleted the one that i Uploaded because someone are ready uploaded a better version for the Box Art Aozz101x (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about the List of Sam & Cat episodes disruptive edits

I've been editing List of Sam & Cat episodes for a while and I'm truly sorry. I will try to get more information on episode 13. Once I get more information, that's when I know I can edit it.

173.32.40.72 (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Once again, I'm sorry and will not cause anymore trouble.

173.32.40.72 (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Image speedy tagging

FYI, you made a slightly wrong tag of an image — after identifying File:Chuck Masters fim director.png as a copyvio of http://elliottbrownagency.co.uk/portfolio.asp?entrytype=Men&ID=602, you tagged it with {{db-f1}}. That's for duplicate images, i.e. there's an identical copy elsewhere on Wikipedia, and it's not meant for copyvios. Nyttend (talk) 04:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Yea, I made a mistake on that one. I checked the revisions history, it said I used the F9 template, but it didn't look like it. --Blurred Lines 11:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Too eager

Hi Blurred Lines. I saw you had tagged as "orphan" the files I uploaded before giving me a chance to add them to their respective articles a few hours later, as was my plan. I reverted your tags. All uploaded files are orphans until they are added to an article, as they must exist first, then added to an article second. Isn't that right? I would say it would be more appropriate to wait 12-24 hours after any file is created before applying this tag to give the editor time to do this. —Prhartcom (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I want upload my production house movie Poster can you able to help me

File:Ivan veramathiri.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3e/Ivan_veramathiri.jpg

Can you able to upload our company movie poster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadiqkhan79 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

License

Thank you for your notice regarding the file named "File:National Stock Exchange of Australia logo.jpg". I made a terrible mistake when uploading, and I put the wrong license tag. I have made a correction and now it is just it should be. Thank you again for your inputs.. All the best. --BiH (talk) 04:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

F7

Note that WP:CSD#F7 doesn't apply to free files such as File:Etymological dictionary of Slavic languages 35.png. F7 can only be used for fair use files. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Also, files should not be tagged for deletion per WP:CSD#F11 if they have {{OTRS pending}} (see e.g. File:Caroline Brooks performing live in Los Angeles, CA.jpg). The {{OTRS pending}} template tells that an e-mail has been sent to WP:OTRS with evidence of permission, and files with this template are typically not tagged for copyright reasons until the OTRS clerks have had a chance to check whether a permission statement has been sent. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

How exactly the file that you mentioned the first time had a non free rationale box on the page, and it's not really a fair use file? --Blurred Lines 21:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

The file had a public domain copyright tag. It was therefore not a fair use file. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your right about the first part, but what I couldn't understand why there was a non free rationale box on the file. --Blurred Lines 19:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Institut Pertanian Bogor flags license

Thank you for notifying me about my university flags picture license. I do not hold any copyright of this picture, and I'm not the original creator (or the photographer of the picture). I believe the picture should be tagged with non-free fair use copyrighted image. Since its taken from IPB website and contains IPB logo and its faculties logos.

Please notify me if I make another mistake in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auditore987 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome, just next time when you upload the file, please add a copyright tag, and a non free rationale box if you don't own it, that way it won't be tagged for deletion. --Blurred Lines 19:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Appropriate to archive User talk page?

Hello Blurred Lines. I now see you have set up MiszaBot to archive threads on your own Talk page that are older than 24 hours. Do you believe that is appropriate? I am asking because I recently tried communicating with you (Heading: "Too eager"), and instead answering, you just let the bot archive messages that had been left that day, as if they had never existed. No link on your Talk page to retrieve archived messages added to the confusion. You also manually delete messages from your talk page if it suits you. I have asked User:Misza13 their thoughts on this. My suggestion is that you turn off the bot; allow other Wikipedians to converse with you and provide them answers; allow time for them to check back later to read your reply. —Prhartcom (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not tell me how to manage my talk page. If I want a bot to archive the messages that I get after 24hrs, let it be, that also includes me not having a archive box. I don't tell you how to manage your talk page, don't do it to me. Also, a user already responded to your ridiculous complaint. --Blurred Lines 19:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

That's fine. I only brought this up because you essentially deleted from your Talk page my original communication without answering it, which I still find really cowardly. —Prhartcom (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)