User talk:Bluesbrotheryellowlight

September 2014

Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Demolition, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Infiniti. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. PhilKnight (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Infiniti, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Infiniti was changed by Bluesbrotheryellowlight (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882667 on 2014-09-14T16:02:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Infiniti. PhilKnight (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of David Beals (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bluesbrotheryellowlight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry for my edits, I didn't realize you were an admin, I just thought you were a vandal. Next time, I'll discuss.

Decline reason:

You know the routine. Kuru (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

comment: Since you seem to be David Beals I hope there won't be a next time, because we're all fed up with your stupid/childish ceiling fan videos... Thomas.W ^talk 16:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]