User talk:Bluenote1939

Welcome!

Hello, Bluenote1939, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Red beans & ricely, -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Groovesect

A tag has been placed on Groovesect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ChaoticReality 20:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred "Uganda" Roberts

Hi. I see you reverted some of the changes I made to this article. No problem with you doing that, but you need to note that your changes have caused (in my opinion) a few 'issues'...

Second paragraph - '...by the encouragement of..' is not good English - I believe 'after' or 'with' would be better. In the same paragraph - 'becoming an in-demand conga player' - is not a neutral point of view - what does 'in-demand' mean here - one gig a night, one a week, forty bands clamouring for his skills ? How do you back-up that remark ?

The paragraph mentioning 'Professor Longhair' - fair enough, he's most well known by that name, but read that paragraph to yourself - 'Professor Longhair' is mentioned five times, and it doesn't 'read' smoothly - can't some of those be changed to 'him/his/Byrd', just so it flows better ?

Part way through that paragraph, you refer to '..Fess' last studio album', but there's no indication of who 'Fess' is - in my version, where it said 'Byrd', at least the meaning was clear. YOU may know it's the same person, but someone without your interests may have no idea.

You added 'the young funk band'.. before Groovesect in the last paragraph, but it's not needed - if they click on the Groovesect link, they can find out all about them. Also what does 'young' mean in this context - does it mean the band members are young, that the group is newly formed, that they're inexperienced or what ? That word can be interpreted in different ways - so I think those words are unnecessary.

Ok, now, stop getting annoyed, take a deep breath and calm down :-)

The reason I'm telling you this here, rather than editing the article again, is that I don't want to start any bad feeling or edit wars with us constantly battling over changing the article. I've just given you my opinions on a few items - just read them through calmly, and think about them. If you disagree with one or all, fair enough - noone owns the article, and I'm sure other people will edit it over time anyway, possibly in ways neither of us would agree with ! :-)

Cheers ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bluenote1939! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 34 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Alfred "Uganda" Roberts - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]