User talk:Blueink500

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Poetry.

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Malik Sealy has been reverted.
Your edit here to Malik Sealy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oSHq79W3qY.) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link

The link I added is an important professional moment for Malik Sealy. Is it not? Well, maybe I got a little carried away. He was from my home-town and I grew up watching him play...

April 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ‑Scottywong | yak _ 03:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blueink500 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A few months back you guys blocked my account as a sock puppet of Festes. Sometimes things look that way, but I assure you that I have no idea who Fastes is. I am writing to ask you to unblock me. I am not gaining anything by this-I am simply trying to help you guys out. I did show poor judgment one time, but it was an innocent mistake-and I sincerely apologize… I have never been blocked before, so I am asking a second chance. Please! Thank you! Blueink500 (talk) 02:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I find the sock case quite convincing, and technical evidence was present as well. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.