User talk:Blueboysucks

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Safwwefe, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 16:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Blueboysucks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Blueboysucks, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 16:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... This is my own userpage. I can do whatever I want with it --Blueboysucks (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No you can't. WP:NPA. Peridon (talk)

Go away troll

eom. --Onorem (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your name is Blueboysucks. You can't ask politely. Go the fuck away troll. --Onorem (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Blueboysucks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Blueboysucks, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Saying that I don't like someone isn't offensive enough to be deleted, especially since it is my own userpage --Blueboysucks (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blueboysucks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The sock investigation, that will prove the claims are untrue through checkuser, has not even been closed. Until that time, I am innocent until proven guilty and cannot be blocked. Blueboysucks (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've not been blocked as a sockpuppet (yet), you've been blocked because you're harrassing other users. Trying to use technicalities to get out of a block isn't going to work here. [stwalkerster|talk] 17:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blueboysucks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Darkhorse483 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wish to change my username, not make personal attacks, and only make productive edits now.

Decline reason:

Pass. You've made your real intentions clear enough. Kuru (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]