User talk:Bluebolt94/Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of George Sorby

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George Sorby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Probably not a good idea to write an article about yourself. AnemoneProjectors 23:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

It was worth a try :P --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 11:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Archive counter

I just saw you changed your archive counter from 1 to 12. I guess you meant 2 not 12 but I just thought I'd let you know that the bot updates it automatically when the 1st archive is full. If you want smaller archives than 120k, just change 120k to a smaller number :-) Your current archive is only 41k. AnemoneProjectors 00:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Bluebolt94. You have new messages at Skier Dude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Armored souls

Hello GSorbyDesroid. I am just letting you know that I deleted Armored souls, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Nancy ^talk 20:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm still getting used to Twinkle. I only started using it last week ;) --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 20:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Ken Barlow (Coronation Street)

I assume this was a mistake? I fixed it. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 20:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh no, I was trying to move it to another title, but it wouldn't let me... --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 20:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I see. I'm not sure there is currently consensus to move the page yet. I'd give it at least a week. The reason you couldn't move the page is because the target already exists. You can only move a page to an existing target if that target is a redirect to the page you wish to move. Otherwise, you'll have to request that the page be moved. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 20:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Images

I thought you knew non-free images had to be of a low resolution. Also the "purpose of use" for File:Stacey's Confession.jpg needs to be changed because it's not an infobox image. You need to explain how it passes WP:NFCC#8. Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 23:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh MAN! I knew I'd forgot something! I knew it!! Yes sure, I will make the necessary arrangements. Merry Christmas AP! :) --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 23:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too :-) AnemoneProjectors 23:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Is that any better? The resolution and purpose of use for File:Stacey's Confession.jpg? --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 23:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Resolution is good. Purpose is a tricky one, I'm never really sure myself what to put there. I would never attempt to upload a storyline image because you need to show that the image adds to the understanding of the text. But never mind! AnemoneProjectors 00:56, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

But it's still better than the Stacey/Max image, so there you go. AnemoneProjectors 01:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I think you should redo Laura Beale's picture so it can be 200px in the article - although it is actually 200px on the image page. AnemoneProjectors 20:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Anemone, that Laura picture is generally bad bad bad. It needs replacing. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 20:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Leave it as it is for now then until a new one can be found? AnemoneProjectors 23:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Yep, I'm sure I can get one :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 00:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Lol what a horrible picture :D AnemoneProjectors 00:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Better than that last one!! Most facial one I could get though :O --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 00:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

That is not better, that's an awful picture. The other one is fine, I dont know why u hate it so much. She's facing the camera and it really is not as bad as u suggest.GunGagdin^Moan 01:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Well it's really bad quality, can you not get in better quality? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 12:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

I've restored an older version which is better quality and not as hideous, so maybe we could use this one? All the old versions of the other one look pixelated. AnemoneProjectors 13:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind using that one but Gungadin says it's not facial enough. I'll revert it and see what she says. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

OK, lets keep this one until something better can be found. its not bad just dont like side facing images but will see if I can find something better sometime.GunGagdin^Moan 18:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep watching those documentaries, they recently repeated the 50 greatest weddings one, I'm sure Laura was seen in that. I don't think it's available on iPlayer though. AnemoneProjectors 21:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

You don't have to ask me in the edit summary to delete the old revisions :-) AnemoneProjectors 16:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

No it's not me, my browser just does it when I type R into the summary. I left you a mesage btw. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 16:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

You can delete it though :-) Oh I didn't see your message because someone else posted a message after it. AnemoneProjectors 17:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Please delete it, it's annoying me :-) AnemoneProjectors 23:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Ahaha! Kay, I'll clear out my browser :) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Can't you just type something else instead? :-) AnemoneProjectors 23:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stacey leaves Walford.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stacey leaves Walford.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stacey's Confession.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stacey's Confession.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

RFA

If you want to try again, it needs to go at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GSorbyDesroid 2. AnemoneProjectors 22:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

And you clearly realised that already :) AnemoneProjectors 22:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I know, I remembered the rules wrong since it has been six months :) --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 22:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GSorbyDesroid 2

Hi GSorbyDesroid. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Michael-Moon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michael-Moon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Leaving over your RFA ?

[1]. ? Please do not. Many admins have failed 1, 2 or more RFA's. You would not have started an RFA if you didn't like the place. A close read of the opposes (mine included) is clear your work is valued - you just need a bit more time and experience. Pedro :  Chat  21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Pedro, your contributions are valued, you just don't have the experience at the moment that the community expect an admin to have. Bear in mind, also, that admins can get a lot of abuse - we sometimes block people from editing, we delete articles, etc - and people don't always like that! Part of being an admin involves being criticised, or abused! Keep up the excellent work you are doing, and don't worry about adminship at the moment -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\^{[alternative account of Phantomsteve]} 21:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

BTW I've asked someone uninvolved to close the RFA - I think you've had enough feedback, and I really hope you don't take it to harshly. Pedro :  Chat  21:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that, in accordance with WP:NOTNOW, I have closed your RFA. Please don't be discouraged, and please don't leave over this process. I know at least one current crat who only passed RFA on his third attempt; just take some time and build up your experience before thinking about another RFA. If you have any questions about RFA, feel free to come and ask me. Courcelles 21:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I've just noticed on your user page: "I may leave Wikipedia because people just go on at me saying that I'm doing more bad than good" - I really don't see anyone saying that at all. RfA is stressful, but as has been pointed out, being an admin genuinely involves a lot of stress, and it requires a good level of maturity to deal with. And I'm sure that's part of the reason some people opposed (I know I did) - we really don't want to drop you into something that we know is very tough, unless we're really sure you're ready. So please, stick around, and carry on your great work. Take it easy, and don't worry about admin for a bit - you're young, and there's really no rush. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with my RfA!, I just think what's the point of being here if all I do is the same old reverting, same old editting, same old correcting. It gets boring after a year... GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 21:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Never mind about this, let's just forget it. I was having a bad day and I would've said anything. I'm better today though :) GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 21:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Pleased to hear it :-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

You don't need to do the same old reverting or editing. If you write an article, you get a new experience every time. That's the beauty of writing, for me at least. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Like I said, I was having a really bad day, I'm fine now, I really do enjoy contributing to Wikipedia!! :) GSorby-Desroid - (Contribs!) 18:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20110107130112218th April Jackson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20110107130112218th April Jackson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 18:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jackson-Walsh ED.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jackson-Walsh ED.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:47, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

File talk:Kelvin1.jpg

Hey, u may be interested in this discussion.GunGagdin^Moan 08:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

No title

i am a bit confuse on how to add a image on a character. I tried a few things but is seemed to go a bit wrong!!!!! also how do you make a characetr be on a new page so like for Vanessa Gold she has a seperate page but Jodie Gold should ahve one to but i cnatmake her one! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 16:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, you need to discuss at the WikiProject about splitting off characters. Vanessa has a reception section and more refs. Jodie is not eligible to be split off yet. There are no images allowed on lists prior to 2010. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

HELP

I have been doing some edits to Connor Stanley,Jodie Gold,Kim Fox,Edward Bishop,Denise Johnson and Grace Olumbumi and the edits are ALL dissapering. I worte on edit for Connor and it took ages and the *gone* it just went and i even saved it! I cannot be bothered to keep on doing edits and for them to keep on dissapering! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 18:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

That's because we are reverting (deleting) them. Your edits seem to be pretty unhelpful. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 18:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

but im trying my best as i put in all about what happened to the characters in the episodes which no one else put on there. Im trying my best =( — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 18:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

i just put a whole wod of information on edward bishop which no one has wrote and its gone it was very detailed!--MayhemMario (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

We know your only trying to help, but you keep adding irrelevant information that is overly detailed. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 18:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

but detail is betetr! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 18:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

It's pointless to add overly detailed information to articles. The only information we need really is things relating to storylines or major happenings. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 18:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes the point is there is too much detail. Especially relating to Connor, it's not important to his article what happened to Bianca. We should keep storylines as brief as possible and only mention the major plotlines. AnemoneProjectors 19:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

She attends Tommy Moon's funeral alongside Kat and Alfie Moon (Shane Richie). She and Patrick set up a alcohol filled car on the Argee Barghee re-opening night much to the disgust of Zainab Masood (Nina Wadia) and sell outside on the road as the restaurant does not have a license.

Is that okay? Not being mean,just asking!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 17:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

It's not overall important to Kim's storyline. It's just a minor event. AnemoneProjectors 21:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

quick question how do you get your homepage like that? How do you get that you watch eastenders?--MayhemMario (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

EASTENDERS CHARCTERS

i agree with you for spliitng off kim but i also think jodie should to! is there anyway we can make 'them' split it off. who actually splits it off? --MayhemMario (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Usually it's me or AnemoneProjectors. Look at the WT:EE and discuss it there. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

so wy dont you just do it,if you split them off you can do what you like!--MayhemMario (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

'Fraid not. It's all discussed at the EastEnders WikiProject. I don't own none of this. It's up to the community. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, we like to reach a consensus before we split off any characters from the lists. Jodie is the same reason as Kim although with the new Poppy scenes there might be more, I'll have a go at it in my userspace if you like and see if it's worthy. ^{AnemoneProjectors} 18:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to bring this up on WT:EE now as I've got 10 references now. ^{AnemoneProjectors} 19:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

You can just restore my Kim image when it's needed right? --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Did it get deleted? I can. I think I have one as well. _{AnemoneProjectors} 21:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Corrie characters list

Hi GSorby, re this edit - I'm just wondering why you think dates shouldn't be included, so long as they're sourced? I know the EastEnders list chooses not to use them, but it's been a facet of the Corrie list for as long as I've had it watchlisted (about 2 years, at a guess). Would you mind opening it up to discussion on the talk page, maybe? Frickative 19:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I guess. But I think things like Role=Regular/Recurring and the month when they're returning makes it look untidy. I look at the EE list, then the corrie list, and I can see what a mess that corrie list was. C'mon you must agree? :-) --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, no, hence why I raised the issue :p I don't think aesthetics is a good reason to remove content, as long as it's verifiable. Frickative 19:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I suppose. Only referenced information then? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Yup, looking through the sources present, not all properly supported the dates that had been included, but this is a pretty solid resource for them. Roles I'm less sure and not particularly bothered about, but other editors might feel differently. Frickative 19:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I know the Neighbours list uses dates for arrivals and departures but everything is removed if it's not referenced, so Corrie should be the same. –AnemoneProjectors– 20:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Favour

The pciture for Lewis Archer (Corrie) is really stretched can you get another one? JuneGloom recomended you that you were good and i obviously agree!--MayhemMario (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario (talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Character images

Hello, I am afraid you have been uploading far too many non-free images of TV characters, e.g. the ones for Pat Evans. Per WP:NFCC, use of non-free images needs to be reduced to the minimum that is absolutely necessary. One image for a notable character is usually okay, perhaps two if the character has been going through a very significance change of appearance (as in the Pat Evans case), but six is really beyond the pale. Please make up your mind which ones you find essential so that the others can be marked for deletion. Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi Fut.Perf. GSorby is just cropping and maybe slightly improving the quality (colours etc) of the existing images, he's not uploading anything new. But in general, EastEnders article editors are removing excessive images from articles (especially storyline images). –AnemoneProjectors– 12:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PeggySlapsLisa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PeggySlapsLisa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Revert

on my last post on kim fox one of the links you placed it back to kim fox's interview where it syas nothing asbout ricky and her kiss. I did put the link to another page on digital spy which was the correct link but you reverted my edits so know it goes to the wrong page can i change it?--MayhemMario (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The link is ok, but all you changed was the reference name. –AnemoneProjectors– 21:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Yusef image

Nothing wrong with the image but I think Michael, Julie and Greg should have come first :-) In fact, I might restore Michael's previous image. Do you want to get one of Julie? Maybe we can leave Greg for now, as that would mean 6 images on the page, and the more we get, the more likely it is to bring attention to it. –AnemoneProjectors– 18:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Sure, Greg barely appears so it's hard to get an image but I'll try. Julie shouldn't be too hard :) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't bother with Greg, just Julie. Maybe do Greg if someone else gets splat off (yes I said 'splat'). –AnemoneProjectors– 19:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Haha, splat lol. Okay I'll do that then GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 19:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Well Done

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For all of your hard efforts taking photos for articles on EastEnders. MayhemMario (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :-) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Technically for someone who goes out with a camera, I was looking at this barnstar earlier and wondering if anyone would ever notice my photos and award me one lol –AnemoneProjectors– 23:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Anna Windass

If you want a different image, please find one that is actually better. Two people disagree with you. Perhaps it is because the new one is not centered and not head on. If you could find one in which is a close up and centered then it would be fine.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Image names

I don't think you need to change "Denise fox" to "Denise Fox EE". If you think it should have a capital letter, I think the image name can match the article name, so just "Denise Fox" would be ok, or "Fatboy (EastEnders)". That's what I would do if I was bothered about renaming them (which I'm not as in most cases I don't think there's any need to). –AnemoneProjectors– 12:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 12:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm

I wasn't sure if we were allowed to use the official Twitter logo in the template, but it makes sense under fair use due to the obvious association to the site. Thanks for putting that in, wasn't sure which one was the official one either. Ironically, I don't tweet myself; I merely made the template after seeing a talk page comment on another talk page saying we didn't have such a template. =) CycloneGU (talk) 06:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey, not a problem :) as long as it's low resolution and has appropriate rationale then it should be fine under fair use, happy to help :D GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 10:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

But now have just realised and reminded by AnemoneProjectors that we can't use non-free images in templates!! Silly me! D: GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 10:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Eh, I thought so. Can you perhaps make a better-quality version of the one I used with transparency? CycloneGU (talk) 14:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeh sure :) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 14:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, I think I like that one better. Bird is facing the reader. =D CycloneGU (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Tweet-new.png did you make this yourself? –AnemoneProjectors– 21:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Ish, I found a bird template and added eye colour and flipped it and hued it a bit. Why? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Where did you find it? –AnemoneProjectors– 22:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Google images, Here GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

It seems identical to one I found on Google Images though, example - [2]. - JuneGloom Talk 22:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hahaha, that's the head I nicked for that! :D GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

They are the same though....RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 22:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Ahhhh people are ganging up on me D: I found that one on google used the head for the body I found and hued the body so it matches the head :) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

So you found an image on Google images, then edited it and claimed it as public domain? No, you can't do that. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Kay my bad, I wasn't sure else it could be, maybe you could correct it? GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

The only way to correct it would be to list it at WP:PUI and have it deleted, because it not available for use on Wikipedia. –AnemoneProjectors– 23:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

You mean you took that image and uploaded it wikipedia. That image shack image was uploaded today by you.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm (continued)

Was about to reply but you've archived. Anyway, what you uploaded is now acceptible! I've fixed the description etc. –AnemoneProjectors– 23:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

By the way it's not very helpful to archive your talk page during an ongoing discussion. –AnemoneProjectors– 23:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, sorry about that I just thought it could go un-noticed but half of Wikipedia ganged up on me lol :| GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

"Half of Wikipedia" lol –AnemoneProjectors– 23:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

The imageshack file being uploaded an hour ago didn't help the case. We didn't gang up on you though. :pRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 23:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Nah, I SLIGHTLY exaggerated! :D Nothing gets past Wikipedia copyrights. And Raintheone, please, how did you know! It's bugging me! :DGSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 23:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

See the original one on the template page, which I uploaded and is identical (but poorer quality I'd say) than this one. I provide the source in that copy of the image. The source clearly states the image can be freely used. It doesn't say anything about altering it, but that then is a modification of a free image and GSorby is clearly releasing the modified version into the public domain. Thus, what is the copyright issue? CycloneGU (talk) 23:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

It's because in the image properties, like with all images, they carry additional info that is easily viewed. That and it's fairly easy to remove the eyes of the bird using any basic image editing software..RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 00:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm. Image properties: created September 20, 2006 for instance. =D CycloneGU (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Where are these image properties? CycloneGU: The current image is fine, but GSorby uploaded one that he apparently copied from somewhere else and not the site that you found, altered it and claimed it as free. That's what the problem was. I've deleted that revision though. –AnemoneProjectors– 00:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I made up the image properties example. =P

Also, I was reviewing the edits where I know I've seen that bird before...and it wasn't there. The image file history also seemed to be missing it. So I concluded an administrative removal had taken place. CycloneGU (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

If an image is uploaded to photobucket, imageshack and so on it usually tells you when...RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

ok because all I could see what the image, not a page the image was on. –AnemoneProjectors– 01:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Search it on Imageshack, try different browers.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know how to use imageshack. But never mind, I'm going to bed. –AnemoneProjectors– 01:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Expected This

You may be interested in this. CycloneGU (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Coming to an agreement

I am trying to round up if Rainie should be split off or not. We are doing a vote to see if she should or not if you would like to vote please go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject EastEnders ‎. Thanks! MayhemMario (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC) =)

i know itas kinda unnecesary in some respects having to vote and everything but im just getting fed up of shall we? shall we not? so i thought i should introduce closure.--MayhemMario (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Just going to ask, you said that you have a picture for rainie cross right? Can you add it to AP's article his is doing so it will pratically look complete? --MayhemMario (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC) (User:AnemoneProjectors/Rainie Cross)

Can't, it was removed because of WP:NFLISTS. if I add it again, we'll probably loose the ones on the 2010 and 11 lists too. Not risking it, wait until AP has split her off (if it happens)) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

no no no, to the article he s making at the moment the link is above --MayhemMario (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Can't, non-free images are not allowed in the userspace. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

A bot deletes them automatically if you try.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 20:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link of a article i have started to make on Rob Grayson. LINK What do you think?--MayhemMario (talk) 17:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

It's good, but there's not much point in splitting him off as he's only been in a handful of episodes. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

hes got 19 refs!--MayhemMario (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

And? He's only very minor and a guest. We used to wait till the character was in the show for at least six months, don;t know what's happened to that. If you want a wider opinion, go to EastEnders Wikiproject talk. GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

No Thanks. I will take your word. I'll delete the article.--MayhemMario (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Wait do we still need the refs?--MayhemMario (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't know. You'll have to ask else where, they may be useful GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 17:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Frickative and I were just discussing Rob and we think it's best if most of the information is moved to Whitney's article, with a link there from Rob's for more information. Frickative is planning to write up the recent Revealed documentary as well, which will give more information. It will mean there's else repeatition between Rob and Whitney, and Rob's section will be more about the character and less about the overall storyline. But do keep your draft as the references might be useful. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, it's all located at User:GSorby/Rob Grayson, do as you please with it :) GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 22:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh I didn't realise you both had a copy! By the way, TV Throng probably isn't a source we should use. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

i dont mean to start a argument or anything ut it just looks like you have just copied my sandbox edit of Rob Grayson and changed the name so it lookd like you have made it. This may not be true and there is probably a reason why i am wrong, i am just asking =)--MayhemMario (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

No, that is yours, I just copied it there to keep it as a backup, that's all :-) GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 16:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Gsorby, do you only like Eastenders. Don't you watch any of the other soaps? If you did it'd be cool if you could help, maybe?Rain the 1 ^BAM 01:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

I occasionally watch Corrie. Emmerdale is not on my list at all though :X GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 16:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh it doesn't matter then. Hoped you would say Hollyoaks, haha. Enjoy your day. :)Rain the 1 ^BAM 16:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Sian Powers and Sophie Webster image update

The Sophie Webster's image is nearly 2 years, produced 7 April 2009. The Sian Powers image is also nearly 2 years old. She started on Corrie January 2009, that capture is from that early period. The actresse's playing these two characters, have totally evolved their characters appearances, and in 2011 look nothing like the images you reverted too. Hence my update, using captures from this ( March ) months episode. Gren500 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Yep, but they are worse quality, and by the way, they haven't changed. I know how images work on Wikipedia, just take a look at my uploads. Try Pat Evans or Peggy Mitchell for example. They haven't changed in appearance unless your counting the wrinkles. Those images of Sian and Sophie are fine GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 20:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

No one is saying do not ever update them, it is just that it is still Sophie. If it was centered more to her face etc, would not have been as bad.Rain the 1 ^BAM 20:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

You and AnemoneProjectors....

		The Special Barnstar
		Well done for splitting Kim Fox off and making it look good, great work! MayhemMario (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!! :D GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 20:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Image redirects

If there are any image redirects I haven't deleted (I know there are), let me know and I'll just delete them, without needing to go through RFD. –AnemoneProjectors– 23:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Image move

Hi GSorby. File:Foto.JPG obviously needs a more fitting title. It is a picture of Aloe Blacc. I see that you are a page mover so would you mind moving it? Thanks. —Half Price 17:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

The image is hosted on Wikimedia Commons, rather than on Wikipedia. Therefore, the rename request needs to be made at Commons:File:Foto.JPG instead. –AnemoneProjectors– 19:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Do not template the regulars

Re John Nelson (banker). Kittybrewster ☎ 12:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Drawing your attention

Im just popping in to draw your attention to my new sandbox on Rainie Cross now with more refs it looks good, what do you think?--MayhemMario (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, there's lots of text and refs. Maybe she can be split off now, and I think she may be sticking around as she's in tonight's episode (here's the preview). Maybe we'll start another discussion to split her off, Good work! :) GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 13:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

thanks! if you look at the last ref on development your abck up your own idea of her staying for longer! --MayhemMario (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Asking for a pic

I dont know if you do but you probably do being the pciture man and everything, do you have a photo of dotty cotton? If you do could you tell me and then add it to the article, Molly Conlin? Thanks GSorby bye, --MayhemMario (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Mario, we can't add screenshots to articles on living people. –AnemoneProjectors– 10:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi what AP said, well what about Hilda Braid? MayhemMario (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes we could use the screenshot of Nana Moon for Hilda Braid, but a new rationale would have to be added to the image decription page. –AnemoneProjectors– 10:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

And it is, in fact, already there. –AnemoneProjectors– 10:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

what i mean is why can we use a picture of nana moon for hilda braid and not dotty cotton for molly conlin? MayhemMario (talk) 10:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Because Hilda Braid is dead but Molly Conlin is alive. A free image of Conlin could be created, but one of Braid could not. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, criterion 1 "No free equivalent". –AnemoneProjectors– 11:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Okay rephrasing my last edit do yuo have a picture of Molly Conlin on her own say at the BSA 2008 or 2009? --MayhemMario (talk) 10:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

One I found a while ago, it's free but I dunno if I'm allowed to upload it, am I AP? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) You can't take one from the internet because it has to be released under a free licence. So you'd have to ask for permission, or take the picture yourself. –AnemoneProjectors– 10:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

GSorby where's this image you found? –AnemoneProjectors– 10:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I found it on Google images, here is the direct link. GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

What makes you think that's a free image? –AnemoneProjectors– 10:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I dunno, nobody owns it, someone just took it, it actually belongs to Conlin does it not? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

It's not free. "All pictures and photos on Contactmusic.com are subject to copyright. At no time should photographs or pictures be taken from this site for use elsewhere." All pictures belong to someone. The person who took the photo is the copyright owner. It's up to that person to release the image under a free licence. –AnemoneProjectors– 10:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to budge in, thats not a free image? I found one of those on their website and they say email for permission, but they never got back to me after five times of trying. Useless website IMO.Rain the 1 ^BAM 10:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

i found one here but it isnt no where near as good as GSorby's. Though with what AP said..... MayhemMario (talk)

Copyright Getty Images, hence the watermark. –AnemoneProjectors– 11:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

(undent) Anemone, off topic a bit, but could you restore ALL revisions File:Rainie cross.jpg as I'm gonna upload a new one and move the filename. Thank you GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, you did LOL! GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

lol I saw the red link as soon as you did the split so knew what you were up to ;) –AnemoneProjectors– 10:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Haa you caught on :) Btw, the first image that Gungadin uploaded for Rainie, can we have on the article, Rainie as she appeared in 2007? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 10:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh I've deleted it now but I don't think we need it anyway. –AnemoneProjectors– 11:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

hi we never finsihed the discussion on molly conlin have you got one? MayhemMario (talk)

hi just want to let you no the hidden message in Lydia Simmonds if you do have a picture of MT playing her that would be good. MayhemMario (talk)

Why would GSorby have a free image of Molly Conlin? I think that question has been answered. But it doesn't matter now as I reinstated the redirect as I don't feel she's increased in notability since her last AFD. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lydia Simmonds (Margaret Tyzack).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lydia Simmonds (Margaret Tyzack).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

All picture related

Could you add the picture of Rainie as she looked in 2008 to her article and the 'high on drugs' one? They look good and it would be good to have more images on articles. MayhemMario (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey! Wrt this image, how do you feel it satisfies NFCC #3a and #8? Frickative 16:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, it shows what she initially looked like when she was on drugs; simple? GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 16:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Apart from a different hair style, she looks exactly the same as in the infobox image. What about this particular image "significantly increase[s] readers' understanding of the topic", that can't be conveyed textually? Frickative 16:47, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Well if you compare them, she looks rough on the 2007 image and the ib image looks really clean and well (if you see what I mean :D) GSσяву ^{Chat with Me!} 16:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Granted, I see that (the ibox image is a very nice shot), but do you think readers would have a lesser understanding that Rainie was on drugs if they didn't see a picture of her looking a bit haggard? The purpose of use in the FUR says that it's the "primary means of visual identification of the subject", but isn't the infobox image primary means of visual ID? Frickative 16:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

i feel that the image of Phil and Rainie (if GSorby dwnloads it) will illastrate it yes! MayhemMario (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Mario, genuine question - do you know that non-free pictures that are just for illustration/decoration aren't allowed on Wikipedia? "Looking good" isn't a valid reason to include copyrighted material - it all has to satisfy the non-free content criteria. Frickative 19:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi GS, I was just wondering why you felt the need to recapture the EastEnders titles, when there was nothing wrong with one from Digital Spy. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Well I captured it again and I fixed the exposure on it and sharpened, nothing major :P GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 10:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I didn't see anyone complaining though. Non-free images on Wikipedia are supposed to be low quality, it probably didn't need recapturing. –AnemoneProjectors– 12:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainie Cross 2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rainie Cross 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Connor-Stanley EE.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connor-Stanley EE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Ken

A quick note on the talk page on how you felt about the ref and why you removed it?Rain the 1 ^BAM 22:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey Rainthe1. Yehh, Ciao is not a reliable source. I think you know what it is, it's just like wikipedia, anyone can contribute, so anybody can write what they want and that's classed as unreliable right? :) GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 22:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

That is all I needed to know George. I'm sure that would have been the general feeling. In future though, just leave a quick note on the talk if there is a discussion. :pRain the 1 ^BAM 22:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Will do :-) GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 23:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Vanessa Gold

Are you ok?! –AnemoneProjectors– 22:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Ahaha! No I'm bloody not! I had a bad feeling all day, this must've been it; Vanessa and Darren are leaving! It's always the best characters, why can't they bin Michael or Carol?! lol ! GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 22:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

lol well it looks like Charlie has quit and they've run out of steam for Vanessa. I'm surprised about Charlie though because didn't he say he wanted to be in it as long as Adam Woodyatt? I'm really glad Jodie is staying though, will be interesting to see how they manage that. Maybe she'll find a new relationship on the Square. Maybe Poppy will come back :D –AnemoneProjectors– 22:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll miss Charlie. Anyway, I reckon Jodie is gonna get together with Ryan!!! That would be.....a bit weird...but that's my prediction! :D GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 22:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I couldn't think of anyone she could get with... I had a thought though... do you reckon Greg is leaving too but they're not telling us so we don't come to the conclusion that Max and Tanya are getting back together? :D –AnemoneProjectors– 22:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Twitter-new.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twitter-new.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Grayson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Grayson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Pics

Hi just wondering about this... At the moment we're getting away with EastEnders pcitures on the 2010 and 2011. Can we add some to 2008 if we be sneaky or not? MayhemMario (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Let's not go overboard. Maybe, but just wait a little while. GSσяву ^{Dιng Dσng!} 18:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

No! They've all been removed by another user, we're not going to sneak them back just because we think we can get away with going against Wikipedia's policies. –AnemoneProjectors– 18:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

deleting refs

Hi, it's not a good idea to remove dead refs if the link no longer works. That would be like saying that the information is only viable as long as it's active on line. The refs provide proof that the article did exist, even if it no longer does, and removing them means the info is unsourced. Please see Wikipedia:Link rot GunGagdin^Moan 15:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Okay, see I don't know the terms of all this!! I'll get used to it :) GSorby - Talk! 15:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Ken Barlow, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. There is a talk on the talk page the image is placed at. Consensus needs to be confirmed. There is talk that using more of the image may be appropriate - however you ignored such suggestions with bold edits - not considering what may be the best use of the image. Rain the 1 ^BAM 17:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Heather Chasen

Hi just asking if you could find a picture of Heather Chasen playing 1) Chasen playing Valerie in Crossroads 2) Picture of Chasen as herself 3) Chasen in Navy Lark? Even if you got one of them i would be over the moon! This time just saying can you find ones we can actually use? Thanks a lot and if you find one for Conlin we can actually use that would be great! MayhemMario (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Even though I'm obsessed with this woman now (cause she's so funny) I didn't know she existed before EastEnders so sorry :( GSorby - Talk! 17:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

so no pictures? Is there anyone i can ask? MayhemMario (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Ask Heather? LOL, sorry I wouldn't know who would have a pic of Chasen GSorby - Talk! 17:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh. If you no of anyone tell me! MayhemMario (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Conlin? MayhemMario (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I own no free images. Sorry GSorby - Talk! 17:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

also, completey differnet subject, will grace be leaving with mercy? I think until it's confrimed we shouldnt do anyhting, obviously but just want to put my point frowards. MayhemMario (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Grace may not leave but it seems likely. However, her arrival wasn't announced and neither will her departure. We'll just have to wait for the episodes. Mario, do you understand what "free content" is, with regard to images, and do you understand the non-free media policies of Wikipeda? You keep asking for pictures of people. –AnemoneProjectors– 21:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Kelly Taylor image

Hi, I think we should either leave it with the one I managed to get to work, or if you are desperate to slightly change it again, upload it from scratch with a completely new file name. But I have no idea why it's messing up so much. –AnemoneProjectors– 16:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Okey dokey :) It's so bloody frustrating though!! lol GSorby - Talk! 17:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Got it to work :L I reverted to my version and moved the file and it worked GSorby - Talk! 17:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Or just keep trying... –AnemoneProjectors– 17:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Nope, I've finished now...you may delete or whatever :) GSorby - Talk! 17:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

You kept trying though lol and I've already deleted or whatever :P –AnemoneProjectors– 21:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the theme tune sample, I wasn't going to revert it lol –AnemoneProjectors– 19:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Could you look at my comment on Talk:Jackson Walsh and tell me what you think. No one edits Emmerdale articles so it is best to ask other people from other projects. Thanks.

Erm....

George, hi, I am a friendly admin who's trying to look at some of the issues concerning Fatty2k10. Now comments like this are never a good idea, and someone in the past has written a page --> Wikipedia:Don't poke the bear which summarises it well. PS: I used to watch east enders and if you need some advice in shoving a few articles toward GA status I can have a look. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)