User talk:Bluebellnutter

Horshamite

The article Horshamite has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B 20:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of UK railfan jargon

Hi, I noticed you've been adding entries to the list. As you will have noticed from the hidden note at the top of each section there is a problem with verifiability in this article. The two entries you added do not have references, although the first one seems plausible from the description given. Do you have verifiable references for those entries? Also, can you please give a summary of the edit in the box provided as this helps other editors to know roughly what has been done and why. Please see the discussion on the talk page of the article for more details. Mjroots (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bluebell Railway rolling stock

Hi, do you fancy tackling the referencing of the rolling stock on the Bluebell Railway. Looks like consensus is that it should be split, but it won't matter if you make a start before the split. For an idea of how to reference individual items see the related article on the K&ESR rolling stock. Mjroots (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently took some photos of Bluebell Railway stock. The PMV at Horsted Keynes, painted in SECR livery and numbered 153, with a lime green door at one end - is that the one listed as No. 1953? Mjroots (talk) 04:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bluebell railway rolling stock

Bluebellnutter, are you aware of the {{cite web}} template? It's not as bad as it seems as you can generally get away with url, title, publisher and accessdate only. Mjroots (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Assessment

You have made an assessment request to the WP:Trains on 1 March 2010 (UTC), for LB&SCR A1 class. I think that article is good. But it has already been rated B. And assessment can be done only to the extent of B-class. So that couldn't help you. You can nominate it as Good Article Candidate for further assessment. You can even request for a peer-review on the article, for more suggestions on improvements. Thank You! --Sharadbob^Talk_C 15:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:25871smallRSBR.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:25871smallRSBR.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:5706smallRSBR.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:5706smallRSBR.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for photo

Hi, I've used your photo on a 31 May 1943 70-year-old diary entry I blog at http://myunclefred.blogspot.co.uk/ - I trust that and the acknowledgement are in order. Please do contact me if this not as you'd wish. My direct mail is tony which is at poemsplease.me - Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony in Devon (talk • contribs) 12:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bluebellnutter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]