User talk:Blue Mango Juice

This is Blue Mango Juice's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samsung Galaxy M01 (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samsung Galaxy M01 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samsung Galaxy M01, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blue Mango Juice! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infinix HOT 9 pro (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Infinix HOT 9 pro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Infinix HOT 9 pro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 06:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you not accepted draft? I mentioned correct and independent sources. Blue Mango Juice (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources may be correct and some where independent, but none established significant coverage of the phone, which is what we usually look for with notability. See WP:GNG for more about this; the notability guidelines can be kind of confusing. Rusalkii (talk) 16:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Infinix Hot 10. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Wikignome Wintergreen^talk 16:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cut & paste articles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blue Mango Juice,

Do not blank Draft versions of articles and cut-and-paste their content into a new article. Please work on improving Draft versions of articles. I recommend submitting them to Articles for Creation for review but you can also choose to move the Draft articles into main space. If you do so, they will be reviewed for their appropriateness for main space and could be tagged for improvement or deletion.

If you have questions about article creation, deletion processes or Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Mango Juice! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Mango Juice! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Deleting a draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Mango Juice! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delete my account, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Mango Juice! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article converting to draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Samsung Galaxy M01

Hello, Blue Mango Juice, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheTechnician27, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Samsung Galaxy M01, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy M01.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samsung Galaxy M01 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy M01, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy M01 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Samsung Galaxy M01. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed the bot's restoration of the template at Samsung Galaxy M01. I have reverted your edit. Wikipedia relies on WP:Consensus to determine content. You should make your views known at the deletion discussion linked from these articles. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Mango Juice! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Samsung Phone article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Male Rao Holkar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy M01. ✗plicit 12:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blue Mango Juice. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sro23 (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I was blocked, I am sorry for doing so. I will not do it again. Please forgive me. Please unblock my account. Thanks. Blue Mango Juice (talk) 12:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for sockpuppeting. I understood my mistake. I will not do this again. Please unblock my account. I am sorry for doing sockpuppeting.

Decline reason:

Indefinitely blocked for create more sock puppets even as you promise to stop doing it. Kids today... NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for sockpuppeting. I understood my mistake. I will not do this again. Please unblock my account. I am sorry for doing sockpuppeting. I will not do sockpuppeting. Some people are thinking that I made one more sock puppet, whose name is Green Apple Juice. But it is not my sock puppet. It is other user. Just give me one chance. Please I request you, unblock my account. I will contribute to Wikipedia by making useful edits.

Decline reason:

WP:SO is your only option at this point. That requires six months with zero edits and zero sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has continued to evade their block. See here. --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think a lack of competence has to be added as an additional block reason, unless this is a Joe job, which I doubt. Quite how further sockpuppetry can be thought to be a way to get unblocked is beyond me. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MyNewBall88, can reset the clock againSlywriter (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Wikipedia account is blocked for sockpuppetry. I understand my mistake. I actually made sockpuppets because my this account was blocked, and I wanted to edit Wikipedia for GOOD FAITH. I not made sockpuppets for vandalism or any other wrong purpose. I really wanted to edit Wikipedia. And I have stopped vandalism. I also have proof - you can check my contributions of my sockpuppets. I only edited for good faith. I hace stopped vandalism. The block is no longer needed. Please try to understand. I only made sockpuppets because I understood my mistake and wanted to edit Wikipedia for good faith. Please unblock my account for atleast 2 days, then check me. If I do anything wrong, so block me again, otherwise unblock me permanently. Thank you. Please give me chance. Blue Mango Juice (talk) 13:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been given the standard offer which means NO editing for 6 months. You can appeal again after 13:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC). - Cabayi (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Muktabai Holkar

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muktabai Holkar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Infinix Hot 10

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Infinix Hot 10, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Infinix Smart 4 Plus

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Infinix Smart 4 Plus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked on Wikipedia for sockpuppetry. But I have decided to stop sockpuppetry and become a good contributor again. Then, I have requested to unblock my account. So, I have been given the standard offer, which means no editing for 6 months. And I accepted it and not edited Wikipedia for 6 months. Now I want my account to be unblocked. I have stopped sockpuppetry. Please unblock my account and I will become a good contributor again. Blue Mango Juice (talk) 10:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion as Logo Editor. This attempt to mislead us will count against you in any future unblock request, if you are ever able to go six months with zero edits. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you have violated WP:3X, you are now considered banned by the community. --Yamla (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Samsung Galaxy M12

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samsung Galaxy M12, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samsung Galaxy M12

Hello, Blue Mango Juice. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samsung Galaxy M12".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue Mango Juice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know that I have used this account for wrong purposes. I accept that I have made new sockpuppets continuously on Wikipedia. But, I AM NOW IMPROVED. IF I MADE NEW ACCOUNT , YOU JUST BLOCK ME FOR NO REASON. WHAT IS THIS? YOU SHOULD ONLY BLOCK THOSE PEOPLE, WHO DO ANYTHING WRONG WITH THEIR SOCKPUPPETS. I DON'T MAKE SOCKPUPPETS FOR BREAKING ANY RULES HERE.I am no longer doing anything wrong on Wikipedia. You can check the contributions of my new sockpuppets. I only made new accounts for GOOD REASONS. I no longer break any rules of Wikipedia. I made new accounts because I just wanted to edit Wikipedia with GOOD REASONS. I know that I done wrong. But, I shouldn't be given any punishment like this. If I made new account, you all just block it for no reason at all. You are only blocking me because I previously made sockpuppets. What is this? You should'nt block me because I made sockpuppets before a long time. I no longer do bad. Please try to understand. I no longer do bad. Please give me a chance again. I will only edit Wikipedia for good purposes . And that's what I am doing since you blocked my previous sockpuppets. I only want to edit Wikipedia for good purposes. Please try to understand. Atleast try unblocking me for 2 days. If I break any rule of Wikipedia, block me again.Blue Mango Juice (talk) 15:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not even waiting for someone to see if you have been socking recently. You don't seem to understand that creating sock accounts is against the rules (as Yamla notes below) regardless of if you intend to use them for good purposes. Breaking the rules to show us your contributions are good is never a good strategy. We want to see that you can abide by rules and not disregard them when you find them inconvenient. It's clear that you aren't able to do that and your promises cannot be trusted, so there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Each sockpuppet account violates WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Your claim that they don't violate any rules is absolutely ludicrous. --Yamla (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]