User talk:Blue Dog97

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cramer family, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cramer family was changed by Blue Dog97 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876161 on 2011-07-26T05:20:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie and other articles

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for participating with soap character articles! The reason that "composite" articles like One Life to Live miscellaneous characters and Cramer family exist is because many/most of the individual soap character articles out there basically violate content policy (all plot summary, no sources asserting notability), and awhile back many were singled out for deletion. There seem to be new articles created for every new soap character, many of which do not meet the threshold of notability, etc. to have an article, and they are only inviting deletion discussions. I ask that you not split out existing sections like Cassie Callison into individual articles unless you have the citations and support material to warrant it, or you are just endangering the material. I invite you to check out some of the guidelines listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas and check out the featured article Pauline Fowler, which is the ultimate example of what a soap character article should be. Thanks again!— TAnthony^Talk 22:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance with Jason and Elizabeth

I want to start a an article for the General Hospital characters, Jason and Elizabeth, and you started the lists for soap opera couples. Can you help me with the history of the couple. It would really be a big help.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 02:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Téa Delgado, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stop cluttering the info box. If she married Todd three times, you include him once and all the dates in brackets afterward. Not to hard to grasp is it. RaintheOne ^BAM 17:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Téa Delgado. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Please stop your disruptive editing and learn how the MOS at the wikiproject dedicated to soap opera articles. RaintheOne ^BAM 17:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to what Raintheone stated: If you keep making this type of edit, I will report you for vandalism. As I stated, he still portrayed Todd Manning even if his character turns out to be a fake. Further, it has yet to be revealed which is the real Todd Manning. Oh, and I know you are Dane97, so I could also report you for being a WP:SOCKPUPPET. Flyer22 (talk) 20:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Téa Delgado. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2.27.28.85 (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blue Dog97 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 5 albert square (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of miscellaneous General Hospital couples for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of miscellaneous General Hospital couples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of miscellaneous General Hospital couples until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AniMate 09:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of miscellaneous One Life to Live couples for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of miscellaneous One Life to Live couples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of miscellaneous One Life to Live couples until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AniMate 16:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of miscellaneous All My Children couples for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of miscellaneous All My Children couples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of miscellaneous All My Children couples until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AniMate 16:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]