User talk:BlueGreenYellowRed

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BlueGreenYellowRed. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! _{Adotchar| reply here} 10:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ae Dil Hai Mushkil Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ae Dil Hai Mushkil Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from India–Pakistan relations without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Even though you wrote an explanation in your edit summary, thanks for that, large changes like this consensus, and it is best to raise the issue on the talk page first and gauge reactions to it. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maratha Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Full Rune^{Speak, child of Guthix} 18:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading new files

Hi, to replace an image, it is not necessary to upload a separate file. You could just overwrite the current file by clicking "Upload new version". Kailash29792 (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at India-Pakistan relations. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ADHM Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ADHM Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your recent editing history at India-Pakistan relations shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Editing at Wikipedia is done by WP:Consensus. It is improper to repeatedly reinstate your preferred version without discussion the talk page. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your recent editing history at Hrithik Roshan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Editing at Wikipedia is done by WP:Consensus. It is improper to repeatedly reinstate your preferred version without discussion the talk page. (2600:1001:B025:A55A:F9A9:484D:8452:5820 (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Vandalism accusations

Accusing an established editor of vandalism (as you did in your edit summary) when their edits are not vandalism is uncivil and may be considered personal attacks. Please review Wikipedia:Vandalism for more on what acts are considered vandalism and what acts are not before accusing anyone of vandalism again. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 18:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hyperbole

Hi there, please avoid using subjective hyperbole, like here where you introduce the hyperbolic phrasing "unanimous critical acclaim". We're not here to drool at the feet of our article subjects. There is no such thing as "unanimous critical acclaim" or "universal critical acclaim". These are absolutes and there can be no absolutes when dealing with subjective ideas like opinions. This is something that has been discussed dozens of times at WikiProject Film and elsewhere, and the community detests it. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JaggaJasoosPoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JaggaJasoosPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]