User talk:Blucdgl
Welcome
[edit]
|
J2 Ukrainians and other matters
[edit]Hello User:Blucdgl. Apologies for my earlier edits on the J (and E) Ydna haplogroups on the Ukrainians article . I mistook “earlier” for “later” as I see it now. So I self reverted. However I do believe that the entire discourse on genetics on pages like this should be re-evaluated. I expressed that here. I will express this on another venue later and I will let you know when I do that. I strongly suspect that the J2 inclusion from Caucasian hunter-gatherers into the Bronze age Yamna population was caused by later intensive contacts between the Yamna’s and the Maykop culture that may have been the descendants of the said hunter gatherers. But all of this goes to show how ambiguous these matters are. And how they invite WP:SYNTHESIS in many ways. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have now editted the sentence in the article so as to allow for that alternative Maykop theory. Blucdgl (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- You have been asked to talk for a few times now. I strongly advise you to do so here. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- User:Blucdgl Content disputes and vandalism are not the same thing. We are both (I think) in contravention of the 3rr rule now. Talk! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- User:Blucdgl, the RfC I spoke to you about earlier can be found here. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- User:Blucdgl Content disputes and vandalism are not the same thing. We are both (I think) in contravention of the 3rr rule now. Talk! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- You have been asked to talk for a few times now. I strongly advise you to do so here. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
[edit]Your recent editing history at Ukrainians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Furthermore, please be aware of Don't Template the Regulars as regards the warning you posted on a regular and experienced editor's talk page. You haven't made any attempts to discuss the content on the article's talk page, but are using edit summaries inappropriately for WP:BATTLEGROUND editing behaviour. Please engage in WP:BRD as you've been asked. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)