User talk:BloopyBloop

Welcome!

Hello, BloopyBloop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pennsylvania did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 16:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BloopyBloop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to update the coronavirus in Pennsylvania page with the latest data from the state's department of health website when I got blocked for vandalism. All the changes I made were numbers from the official website, I was not trying to disrupt in anyway. I am interested in the data in the current pandemic and I created an account to help the effort of updating the site as soon as new data becomes available. This is my first making an account and using it to edit. In fact, I updated the same page with new data yesterday but I was not logged in so I decided I would make an account today so I can keep track of my contributions. Thank you BloopyBloop (talk) 1:06 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Despite the name matching a long-term abuse pattern the edits, as at time of blocking, are not conclusive enough, per consensus. Unblocking due to consensus to do so and also I have a soft spot for those who request review of an action in the proper manner. All the best in your edits, N.J.A. | talk 10:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NJA: - would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also don't understand the reason for the block, BloopyBloop's edits appear to be in good faith. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not to pile on, but I too respectfully don't understand the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the username. It looks like something that My Royal Young (talk · contribs) would use. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NJA: I don't want to pile on either, but this user's edits didn't seem like vandalism, but just uncited. I could be wrong, but I've seen a lot of good faith, but unverified, edits over the Coronavirus in the last few days. Is it possible the name is just a coincidence? Whisperjanes (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]