User talk:Blooper Glooper

Blooper Glooper is an enemy character in Super Mario Sunshine. (No relation.)

If you have anything negative or hostile to say about my edits, please write those comments in the /dev/null article. (Get it?)

Bush is Lord

A tag has been placed on Bush is Lord, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (aeropagitica) 02:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request for speedy deletion on Bush is Lord

Thank you so much for trying to ruin my hard work. You know what I don't understand about you administrators? It's that you guys always condemn added vandalism as "ruining others' hard work" even when it doesn't change what is actually there, yet you go around condemning pages for "speedy deletion" just because it doesn't suit your "eligibility criteria". What a hypocritical contradiction! Anyway, the article should be considered notable because it relates to George W. Bush, a political figure that is already established to be relevant. Also, I'm not promoting the ideas of an organization, but rather presenting them and even being critical of them. Perhaps you are thinking more along the lines of an NPOV argument? --Blooper Glooper 02:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The website is non-notable according to WP:WEB; it also has a very low Alex rank. Politics doesn't come in to deciding whether an article is notable or otherwise - it is simply a case of measuring against the relevant criteria. Regards, (aeropagitica) 02:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr. Fucking Asshole

Please don't Glen 04:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't what? --Blooper Glooper 04:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Create usernames like this and User:Suck Fuck Glen 05:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My vandalism sub-article was deleted!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blooper Glooper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't vandalise WP at all! I just made a vandalism sandbox subpage for fun within my own user namespace. What's wrong with that? Why was the page deleted? I demand that it be put back! It doesn't affect anyone using WP other than those who wish to contribute to it.

Decline reason:

We don't encourage vandalism here and user namespace pages are to be used for Wikipedia business only. -- Yamla 14:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.