User talk:BloodLinedBandLead
Welcome
[edit]Hello, BloodLinedBandLead, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --D-Day What up? Am I cool, or what? 20:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Green Day
[edit]Hey, can you provide a reference for the Green Day sales totals you have posted so we can cite them on the article? Thanks. WesleyDodds 02:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Church AfD nominations
[edit]- Thank you so much for saying what you did. First of all, while I am an atheist, that does not have a single thing to do with this. I did not create the atheist wikiproject...in fact I haven't even been to that page. I did nominate the burnt church first nation by mistake, which I changed to speedy keep as soon as I found that out. I got these churches from church stubs, not by googling as you put it. I read each article, and nominated the ones that I felt were not notable. As with other AfD's, there are articles that are notable to some, and not to others. I did not feel that they were notable, and I still don't think most of them are. However, there are a few that have done significant work since I tagged them, and I will make the change to keep. Thank you for judging me and automatically assuming that I have an agenda, and that my religious beliefs have something to do with this, when that is the EXACT opposite. --Адам Райли Talk 05:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Apology completely accepted! I think that I'm in the same boat with you, and completely understand where you're coming from. I know that Christianity is constantly under attack (although not any more than any other religion), and it bothers me, considering that Christianity is one of the most historically important religions out there. I think that I just went about grouping the churches together wrong. I was trying to clean up sections at a time, and...hey, churches were a good place to start. I knew about the groupings of AfD's, but didn't think it would have ended up that bad. All of the churches I nominated seemed to be rather poor to me...a lot of them had significant work to show their notability, and I won't nominate them in the future...but I'm sure I'll be nominating a lot of them again. Anyway, apology accepted, and hopefully this will make me think twice about giving such a small description for a large number of churches in the future. --Адам Райли Talk 05:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Virus Alert
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Virus Alert, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virus Alert. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B.Wind (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Mount Olive Church of God for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mount Olive Church of God is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Olive Church of God until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TimothyJosephWood 18:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)