User talk:Blinkybill75

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Animals of Farthing Wood characters with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 02:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blinky Bill (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blinky Bill (TV series) was changed by Blinkybill75 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879868 on 2012-04-01T03:36:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Farthing Wood Episodes

Hello, Blinkybill75. You have new messages at ShelfSkewed's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Curious Man for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shirt58 (talk) 04:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Leave Me Alone

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blinkybill75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want you to all leave me alone and let me make peaceful edits. Are you ever going to do that?

Decline reason:

Editors who follow the rules go can go forever without issue. Those who vandalize, evade blocks, WP:SOCK, etc, will be continually held to the same standards as everyone else (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mr. Curious Man/Plumber690 or whatever... just understand what you have been blocked for, and for why the community unanimously decided to ban you, before requesting unblock again. B music ian 11:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blinkybill75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand. I've gone to the account, and said I'll stop using it. Now will you just leave me alone.

Decline reason:

The persistent socking clearly shows that you are not understanding. You are NOT allowed to create multiple accounts. You are NOT allowed to edit until your block and banned has been rescinded. To enforce your block and ban, any and all edits you make may be reverted. Come back in 6 months to a 1 year, then we can talk. As for now. Talk page access revoked. Elockid ^(Talk) 12:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Mr. Curious Man, you are community banned which clearly states that you are NOT WELCOME on this site. Stop screwing around like a child and grow up. Soviet King (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feed the troll. B music ian 12:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, apologies, I have corrected my statement above. Soviet King ^{In Soviet Russia, page edit you!} 10:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]