User talk:Blellum

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Blellum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and some comments

Snake George was deleted first time by another admin because it was copied from a website. In Wikipedia, all content have to be distributable under our copyright policy; you can't just copy-paste content from random web pages without getting the content relicenced beforehand, sorry.

I deleted the article second time because it was basically just an external link. Wikipedia content should explain itself without relying too much on external links, and this article basically entirely relied on that. It was further deletable because the article didn't really say why the article subject was notable in any way.

So, how to proceed? Take a look at other Wikipedia biographies. Make sure the article has at least basic information down, briefly. Make sure the article answers the question "why should anyone care about this person at all?"

Happy editing =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some further hints: Try to answer some basic questions, like "who was this person? when he lived? where he worked? what he did? why he did this stuff, and why was what he did impressive at all?" Read the article you wrote through: If it makes people puzzled at all on any level, it's probably bad. Also remember that articles might get deleted if there's no tying points or context: "someone did something somewhere" is not a good start for an article because no one else knows how to expand it. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: You probably want to create the article as Hans-Joerg Wiedl, since biography policies say the biographies have to have real names of the people. Nicknames should have redirects instead (for example, Jimbo Wales redirects to Jimmy Wales.) You can always create a redirect to Snake George that points to this article, then mention the nickname on the article page.

And finally: You can use your user space for preparing articles before you "release" them for others to edit. For example, put your content down to User:Blellum/Snake George, work on it until it looks like a respectable article stub, then use the Move command to move it to its final supposed location. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I'll start here presently

Hans-Joerg Wiedl aka Snake George, a snake expert, resident on the island of Cyprus.

When he first came to Cyprus, as a UN soldier in 1973 he was struck by the beauty of the island, and moved permanently in 1986.

He has been totally committed to the herpetology of the island. Though this has been fraught with set-backs (see below).

His motto is "Without information , there is no protection of nature and environment"

Blellum 19:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Greenough

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Patrick Greenough. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 23:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Michelle de Bruin - Stonecarver

A tag has been placed on Michelle de Bruin - Stonecarver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~Beano~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Thomas Greenough

A tag has been placed on Thomas Greenough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 12:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Blellum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 43 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Paul Goodfellow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Goodfellow

The article Paul Goodfellow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO, even before most of the content was removed

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 20:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at the WP Scotland noticeboard. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...Changing the title of a page, there is a typo...

Blellum (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Moving a page. eurodyne (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...all done

Proposed deletion of Michelle de Bruin

The article Michelle de Bruin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of meeting WP:CREATIVE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michelle de Bruin with wolf in progress - mandwolf.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Michelle de Bruin with wolf in progress - mandwolf.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.