User talk:BlazingKhan

Hi, BlazingKhan. I found your page! Don't mind if I give you a little boost to end your self-proclaimed laziness. You are about to have a page. ---G.T.N. (talk) 23:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, BlazingKhan, do you not advocate traditional counties in Britain? ---G.T.N. 22:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Javan for info on the Javan-Greek connection, Gomer and Cimmerians for Gomer-Celts connection (you might also try Celts). Madai is connected at the very least with the Medes, but sometimes with the Indo-Iranians as a whole. However the Scythians fit Ashkenaz better, and so not all the Indo-Iranians are from Madai. This also makes sense with Gomer being Cimmerians.---G.T.N. —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And this *map of the distribution of "Cimmerian" bronze finds in Europe, and check out the maps on the Hallstatt culture article. ---G.T.N. 01:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Tiras, a shoe-in for the Thracians also fits well with Trojans and Etruscans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gladius Terrae Novae (talk • contribs) 01:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My whole issue with the traditional counties is one of identity. The poeple of Britain once owned tribal lands, which became Roman civitates, which became Romano-British kingdoms, and then Anglo-Saxon tribal lands and then kingdoms and then Norman counties, and all these territories throughout the history of Britain have changed very little, and mummies from millenia ago have been genetically identified with their descendents only a few miles from where the remains were found. The traditional counties are more than administrative units, they are lands which belong to peoples, and the UK government has no right to change who these people are and erase the lines history has drawn. "Move not the ancient boundary stones you fathers have set." That's why I support traditional counties. ---G.T.N. 21:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How ould you like to work on identifying the Table of Nations? It would be a little work, but it would be fun and I think we could make some progress. Who knows, maybe it could be the first step to a positive Christian Creationist history. ---G.T.N. 21:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]