User talk:Blaze The Movie Fan/Archive Sep 2007

Extended version

{{HelpMe}}

You're going to need to be more specific what it is you're looking for. Extended version of films etc.? Doesn't look like it. KTC 01:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, what I mean can I redirect this to the most likely topic? The most likely one would be extended DVD versions of movies, is anything like that? TheBlazikenMaster 01:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure I still understand the question, but if an film has a extended version I think it would come under the same article as the normal length film, and if they searched for film x (extended edition) I think it would be possible to make a redirect to the portion of the main article where it talks about the extended edition.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 02:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Damn, I thought I was specific enough. What I mean is: Is there an article or a section that speaks of extended versions in general? TheBlazikenMaster 12:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Not as far as I can find. KTC 13:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Umm...bzzt?

I'm chortling at this. It is irrelevant discussion, isn't it? -- Altiris Exeunt 05:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed. I liked your edit summary, though. -- Altiris Exeunt 06:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Peter Griffin

Yeah, so what if I used an edit summary? It is really important, and so what if it's fictional? It still can be described as well as normal characters. There is nothing "wow" about me using edit summary, edit summaries are important, without it edit war could come. TheBlazikenMaster 13:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

It's not a big deal, but it's a bit unprofessional, and may make editing the article feel a bit less hospitable, especially for women, and nerds of all genders who might identify with Meg. Not all of us were popular growing up, and some of us object to the social hierarchy that this type of judgement enforces.

None of this is as nearly serious as using an Edit summary to attack another user, and it wasn't something I felt a need to comment on (until I read yr message to Cromulent), but per WP:CIVIL and maybe WP:other_policy, it's something worth refraining from.

My $0.02, YMMV, and so forth. / edg ☺ ★ 14:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. TheBlazikenMaster 14:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

'scool, bro. / edg ☺ ★ 14:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Motorbiking license and motorcycling license

{{HelpMe}}

I've just gone ahead and redirected it. For a lot of countries (as can be seen from a quick scan of the aforementioned article), driver's license covers riding a motorcycle. KTC 16:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Just out of curiously

{{HelpMe}}

Category:Fantasy television characters and Category:Charmed characters, was the closest I could get.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 12:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand my question, I mean category for the TV shows themselves, not the characters. TheBlazikenMaster 12:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

no I totally understood the question, that was the closest I could get.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 12:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Zing zing, a quick google search [1] gets the goods.--Kerotan^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 12:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I decided to look at the categories of Charmed, I should've looked up myself, it's Category:Fantasy television series, and OH MY GOD, if Fairly OddParents is there, that must mean animated series are also included. TheBlazikenMaster 12:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Pokephilia

Curious about this [edit summary]. Are there Pokemon who are somehow homosexual? I presume this would be either symbolic or just fan lore, but I'm not versed in the critters and have no way to evaluate this new info. Should WP:LGBT be alerted? / edg ☺ ★ 13:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

About your question.

As you might or might not know I do compare Pokémon to animals as they are creatures from another planet. But no, it shouldn't be alerted to that, it was just a creative edit summary, like most of yours are. TheBlazikenMaster 13:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for filling me in on this. I had no clue, but was enjoying the image of Pikachu et al going all Brokeback Mountain. Maybe there's some slash fic on the subject. / edg ☺ ★ 14:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Uncensored

{{HelpMe}}I need someone else's opinion, is the headnote I made good enough? I don't know crap about if it's an article about event, or whatever it is. My headnote, is it good or not? I really don't know if it's good enough. Just making sure. TheBlazikenMaster 13:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Are you talking about the "TheBlazikenMaster is busy watching...."? If so, it looks fine to me....if not, please let me know what it is you are refering to and I will post back. - NeutralHomer ^T:C 15:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: Now I see what you were talking about....my apologizes. Yes, the "headnote" looks OK, but I would have it read "This article is about an sporting event, for infomation about censoring, or the lack thereof, on Television, please see Censorship." You could probably leave the "...or the lack thereof..." section if you wanted.

Sorry for my confusion....that's what happens when I try to edit when I haven't had any sleep. :) If you still have questions, please let me know, I am glad to help. Take Care....NeutralHomer ^T:C 16:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The list

The people who are adding the meme have been disregarding warnings. Adding a hidden note isn't going to work. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Kacheek!)} 18:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries...

Hello, Blaziken, just dropping by. I like your edit summary, which was funny and reflected consensus. Just for the moment, could you see this and tell me if it is appropriate? Thanks. -- Altiris Exeunt 13:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Welcome

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for August has been published. September's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
• Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 14:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm . . . This Might Be Crazy

So feel free to slap me for my foolishness, should it appear. Is it really bad to have the pokemon names linked? Some of their evolutions are not on the same pages, for example Aipom and Etebossu aren't. If I wanted to read the description of Aipom and then Etebossu, the link would be convenient rather than going list hunting. -WarthogDemon 18:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Er, valid point. That would be ridiculously excessive. Anyways that makes more sense to me now. Cheers. :) -WarthogDemon 18:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Supernatural being redirects to spirit while supernatural beings redirects to legendary creature

{{HelpMe}} |I know they both should redirect to the same place, since it's really the same, only difference is one is in plural and one is in signual. Help me please? I don't know where it belongs, as both articles make perfect sense to me. TheBlazikenMaster 13:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)}}

My suggestion would be to make a disambiguation page at supernatural being. List both spirit and legendary creature as something it may refer to, along with any other applicable terms. Feel free to repost your helpme template if you'd like another opinion. Hoof Hearted 13:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

DVD Box Set

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article DVD Box Set, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Captain panda 21:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. It will just get deleted and no one will really care. It's no trouble to get it deleted, actually. Just read the guidelines on creating articles and make sure the article you plan to write hasn't been written previous and you will fine. Captain panda 21:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Pokémon (21-40)#Nidoran♂

{{helpme}}

I reverted this edit two days ago, the bot edit. But it happened again today. I have feeling it will happen again in not-so-distance future. Where do I report bot errors? Places to report a error from a simple bot won't work since these are two different ones. TheBlazikenMaster 15:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

There's a standard framework for interwiki bots that adds interwikis by copying them from other wikis. For instance, if the article about a particular Pokémon in another language has an interwiki to the combined article in English, the bots will add the corresponding interwiki in the other direction. I don't know if there's any way to exclude all interwiki bots, but only interwiki bots, from a page; in extreme cases, you can use {{nobots}} on the page to exclude all bots from that page, which will stop the interwikis but also other potentially useful bots. ({{bots}} can be used to exclude specific bots, if you come across a list of all their names.) The bot owner's noticeboard may be a more useful place to report/discuss this. --ais523 15:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)