User talk:Blancmagne

March 2015

Hello, I'm 115ash. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Australia–Indonesia relations— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 115ash^→(☏) 12:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australia–New Zealand relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blancmagne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Hello. My first interest is on Australia-Indonesia relation and something less on Aus-NZ. I once had edit the first on another account but out of lazy habit (& forget the password [duh!]) started up this one. Checkuser since 2008 has not found evidence of banned user's intriguement and even then seems to have not touched the subject of Australian external relations. So I'm puzzled. When comparing versions the larger one, now that is suppressed, reads as more up-to-date and as well comprehensive - supported by past commenters on the article talk page. How to go about this without misguided accusation of 'vandalism'(!?) to have to deal with shown close above?? English is not my first language so sorry if things are roundabout and not easy for understanding. Gracias."

Decline reason:

You are obviously DavidYork71. I'm also turning talk page access to prevent further time-wasting unblock requests. Nick-D (talk) 09:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.