User talk:Blakematusheski

Blake Matusheski

Mrs. I’m not refusing. Where do I find my previous articles to fix it. And can you please stop sending me death threats.

Proposed deletion of Blake Matusheski

The article Blake Matusheski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~delta ^{(talk • cont)} 22:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I recharged it. Is their anything to improve? Blakematusheski (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blake Matusheski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blake Matusheski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

I understand and agree to the rules. I would never make inappropriate biography. I use reference and highlights the word that relates to a specific article. Is it that it didn't met the policy to have it publicly since there are no websites or other information. Besides I link my social media pages. Blakematusheski (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for editing purely for promotional purposes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason= input ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 01:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

You won't be unblocked if you only intend to write about yourself. This is promotional content and is not allowed on this project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blakematusheski (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the rules and guidelines, including that self-promotion is not allowed. I know how to use appropriate sources, such as articles, TV shows, books, and magazines, and I will not use them for self-promotion or self-biography.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Reading our guide to improving articles.
• Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

• 1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
     • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

help request

How do I find my proposed edits that they were deleted?Blakematusheski (talk) 02:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)}}

Wait until you have been unblocked before you ask questions about editing. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Um they said the ban was permanent so I'm confused. Blakematusheski (talk). 07:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Nobody said you were banned, nobody said your block (which is different to a ban) is permanent. Instead, you are blocked indefinitely. "Indefinite" means with no fixed end date. I provided you with a means to demonstrate you should be unblocked, so far you are refusing to take that path. --Yamla (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

I’m not refusing. I’m not a high quality Wikipedia editor and I’m not promoting myself or nobody else that I don’t have notability articles. Blakematusheski (talk). 23:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve

Hello Yamla.

I’m willing to follow directions to do better for Wikipedia users to not be disruptive and be familiarize by Wikipedia guidelines so no more consequences don’t happen again.

I’m asking for help that since my articles were deletions from speedy and proposed, how do I find my pre-existing article to improve? Blakematusheski (talk). 19:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

This is clearly explained above. "See this index of articles needing improvement for ideas." Be warned, it's starting to appear as though you lack sufficient competence to follow the instructions; see WP:CIR. --Yamla (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

add "{{Help me|Your saying is to make a new article however is to don’t talk about myself? ~~~~}} Blakematusheski (talk). 23:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm considering updating your block to reflect your very, very clear WP:CIR issues and revoking the path I offered you to unblocking. Please explain to me why I should not do that. --Yamla (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Dear Yamla,

I understand that my actions on Wikipedia have led to a block due to Self Promotion. I take full responsibility for my mistakes and assure you that I have learned from this experience. Upon reflection, I realize that my edits were not in line with Wikipedia's neutral point of view and I compromised the encyclopedia's credibility.

I want to assure you that my intention was not to promote myself, but I understand how my actions may have been perceived that way. I'm committed to making a positive contribution to Wikipedia and I'm willing to learn and improve. I will strive to follow the policies and guidelines, particularly those related to neutrality and conflict of interest.

I would greatly appreciate guidance on how I can improve my editing style to avoid Self Promotion in the future. I'm eager to learn from experienced editors like yourself and contribute to the encyclopedia in a meaningful way.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to Wikipedia's values.

User:

blakematusheski Blakematusheski (talk). 20:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I have upgraded your block to reflect your rampant WP:CIR issues and inability to understand what you have been told. I no longer support an unblock under the terms I outlined above. You are free to make a new unblock request but you'll find it difficult to convince another admin that you've suddenly addressed the WP:CIR concerns. --Yamla (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)