User talk:Blaise Joshua

PIs

Hi there. Like you, I'd much prefer to omit the full stops altogether. Sadly it was written that way originally (and is largely an American term), so by Wikipedia etiquette we're forced not to. But to me the logic is that if you're going to put a full stop after the first letter you should also put a full stop after the second, since it's the word "investigator" that is abbreviated, not the word "investigators" (since the "s" is still there), and the full stop merely indicates an omission (as does the apostrophe in "it's", for example). By omitting the second full stop you're effectively creating a hybrid between the British English and the American English abbreviations. -- Necrothesp 15:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Spiciest Hits

Hi again. Nothing you've done wrong. It was deleted as per the votes, then someone recreated it. I've deleted it again. Cheers. -- Necrothesp 13:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uffie

I think you should keep that text in about uffie and her beef with Curtis Vodka and Roxy Cottontail. Its great reading.

Get back to me on what you want to do.

stacksofstacks@gmail.com

yo man sorry. I thought Wiki would send me an email saying that you responded to my post but I guess they do not. So lets talk about this. The stuff I wrote it totally factual so what do I need to do to post it. Do I need to get some one else verify the stories?

Let me know whats good. you can hit me on the email also if you want to keep this on the private tip.

Peace

Stacks of stacks

Hi there ...

No problem discussing this, but could you please sign your messages with your Wikipedia name so that I can access your talk page? Cheers. Blaise Joshua 20:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo bro Diplo talkig some shit on Uffie. hahaha. ~~casikroth~~

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Autamata, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Burzmali 01:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Autamata Page

Hi. What was wrong with the Autamata page? Blaise Joshua 09:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I nominated it for speedy deletion because it failed to make any assertion that the band was notable. Even the articles that linked to Autamata weren't really praising them. Feel free to recreate it, but add something showing that some credible source (a magazine or notable web source) has noted his existence. Burzmali 21:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Willy, your mate 07:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Look at your recent edits and realize. You've redirected the whole talk page into an archive? That's vandalism.--Willy, your mate 07:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The archives should be on top of the page, accessible by a link to it. It's for old discussions and the new ones should be on the main talk page. Once it gets old, it all goes into the archives.--Willy, your mate 08:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Still the link is dead, but like all other talk pages, the link to the archives are on the top of the page and the talk right now are all below that. So I'm just trying to make a talk page like that.--Willy, your mate 08:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good. Now it's all clean and tidy.--Willy, your mate 08:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to trick people. It's cool, lol, like Adam.J.W.C.'s talkpage.--Willy, your mate 08:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]