User talk:Blahaccountblah

Thanks for your contributions to the 4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine article, though your edits are without merit. DOC is an unscheduled drug in the United States. It is likely that it would be considered an analog (of DOB), in which case, sales for human consumption or possession with the intent to ingest could be prosecuted under the Federal Analogue Act though there has been no subsequent court cases which prove that DOC can actually be prosecuted under this act. Tall Midget (talk) 00:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the misunderstanding, what I was trying to say is that the article cannot say that DOC can for sure be prosecuted under the Analog Act. If you're familiar with chemistry, pretty much anything can be considered an analog of another drug. Just because the DOJ says that it's an analog doesn't make it an analog drug; it only makes it a likely analog, A proper wording be "the United States DOJ considers it an analog drug". This would have to be proven in court as the analog act is very vague in stating what an analog drug is in the eyes of the law. Tall Midget (talk) 18:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Thanks for your contribution to Talk:Graff Diamonds robbery raising the possibility that I plagiarised the article from some Russian blog, though your concern is without merit: the article was written in early August, whereas the blog post appeared in September. Keristrasza (talk) 10:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely concern is merited, other details just serve to remove it. Anyways, glad to hear it was them copying WP as hypothesized. blahaccountblah (talk) 21:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Carcassonne (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Carcassonne (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Carcassonne (board game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]