User talk:BlagoCorzine2016

GREED IS GOOD

Welcome!

Hello, BlagoCorzine2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Please don't patronize me because I don't have the same political stance as you do, and don't remove additions to my talk, thank you. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 22:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Muhammad Allen

Sorry for ruining your pristine page. It wasn't me who removed your edit. Supertouch (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, no prob. I thought it was you from the revisions, but I must have skipped one. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi Party. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop your disruptive editing, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss this on the talk page first. fetchcomms☛ 22:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Nazi Party. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DanielRigal (talk) 22:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read the talk page. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 22:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you because you are engaging in an edit war, have nor provided reliable sources and said see the talk but on the talk there was: Your opinion, the counter argument and no consensus reached yet. If you really want my opinion, I would be happy to chime in. But you are not gonna like it. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

just letting you know, wikipedia is to add facts, try not to talk about personal things on wiki unless it is vital to the article. in case your wondering where this is coming from, it is in adventure time with fin an d jake.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:No understand.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:No understand.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nazi Party

Agreed. We should mention the party's leftist inclinations as well. However, my specific problem lies in stating that the Nazi Party held far-leftist views, economically or socially; the Nazis were neither socially progressive nor economically centralist, having left the private sector formally in the hands of its rightful owners. --UNSC Trooper (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BlagoCorzine2016

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to explain why I did that, it was the fact that you had a picture of three people, two of which have been convicted of offences and one who hasn't with the suggestion that they all took bribes. That isn't what a user page is for and it could cause trouble. If the page does get deleted then I would suggest to make a new one with just the userboxes and the message. You could even leave the bit about bribes in as a joke. Once it is removed from its attachment to anybody in particular it wouldn't be a problem. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem to have been a problem for the site or anyone on here for the past year that I've had it up like that, but I'll change some of it if need be. Also just for the record, I put up Don Vito's picture as a joke towards his arrest, I don't accuse him of bribery in any way. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{{helpme}} You need to ask a question under the helpme template for us to answer! Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He would like his user page (which was deleted) restored, minus the inappropriate material that caused it to be deleted, so that he can get his userboxes back. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes restored Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks to both of you for your help. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 00:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to List of PlayStation 3 games, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 03:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Don't do this again. It's not funny (in case you thought it was). You've been in trouble for having offensive content on your user page before. Next time I see you trolling like that you will be blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, on second thought, seeing also the faked video cover at File:DmC xbox 360 cover.jpg, plus this [1], plus this [2][3] piece of offensive BLP vandalism, plus your earlier rather blatant tendentious edits on Ku Klux Klan and Nazi Party, plus the previous episode about your user page, I have blocked you indefinitely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]