Jump to content

User talk:Blackvegit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Blackvegit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Monty845 13:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
you'r ow some Wikipedia is great i just love it thank you so much Blackvegit (talk) 10:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blackvegit, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Windy day, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing!  Chzz  ►  07:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A windy day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Insanity IncarnateTalk 13:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Grammar school rawalpindi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 11:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Good Humor
For giving yourself a barnstar. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 11:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Goku. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Robinson Crusoe page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjornars (talkcontribs) 14:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mubarak Shah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS Talk 09:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mubarak Shah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Grammar School Rawalpindi. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SMS Talk 10:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

You're welcome, but as you have already been told above, please refrain from making unconstructive edits.

Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Speed, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Speed was changed by Blackvegit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958607 on 2012-01-26T15:42:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

[edit]

Hi Blackvegit,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

  1. Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
  2. If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
  3. What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@wikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:18, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grammar School Rawalpindi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grammar School Rawalpindi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammar School Rawalpindi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grammar School Rawalpindi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grammar School Rawalpindi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammar School Rawalpindi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 09:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]