User talk:Blackpress

You have recently created several articles that do not meet wikipedia's standards. Please see Wikipedia:Tutorial, Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:NPOV for information on how to properly edit and create articles. --Tainter 17:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that you made a change to an article, LGBT adoption, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to LGBT adoption. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT adoption ‎

First, I have removed the message you left for me on my talk page as, in leaving it, you erased the comment someone else left previously. Please take care not to do that if you choose to repost your message to me.

You clearly are not neutral in your point of view on the topic of LGBT adoption and, in my opinion, your feelings on the subject are evident in your editing. You did not cite any source to substantiate your comment regarding, "Legally Kidnapped" (It does not appear in the Patterson paper you cited) and Patterson stated that, "... there is agreement among the parties that the interests of children should be considered ahead of other concerns" (pg. 2). Your paraphrasing stated that, "The gay lobbyists argue that the welfare of children alone should dictate policy." With all due respect, Patterson does not say that at all. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion but that opinion should not dictate the editing that is done. If there are opposing viewpoints, they can be added to the article but not to replace view with which you do not agree. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went back to check both of your edits to the article and, despite adding new information and deleting old information, you did not add a single new source for your information.

I would strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia's guidelines on Neutral Point of View and Citing Sources. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to try to answer them for you. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]