User talk:Blackopsmo

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Jones (politician), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Tha Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Jones (politician), you may be blocked from editing.

If you can offer a bonfide, fact-based reason (with backing reference) why the information about Tim Jones and the "birther" lawsuit should not be included in his Wikipedia entry please present it. Otherwise please cease & desist with the constant removing of the section. Just because something is unsavory to you is not a valid reason. Sector001 (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2nd warning. Request for discussion/arbitration.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

AGAIN I ask you to stop removing relevant information on the "birther" lawsuit from Tim Jones (politician) Wikipedia without justification. If you would like to discuss the issue please feel free to contact me here User talk:Sector001. Further, if you wish we can seek a neutral arbitration from a Wikipedia administrator on the issue and I am willing to abide by their judgement. I have rewritten the section you have removed, provided yet more supporting sources and quotes from Representative Jones to provide his point of view. For the record, I am neutral (in fact I'm a longtime Missouri Republican voter) on the birther issue and am only insistent on including it because it is factual and does have relevance to voters, especially now that Rep. Jones is in a position of power within state government. If you are a friend, or perhaps a staff member, of Speaker Jones you are doing him no favor in this constant disruptive behavior. If it continues I will be forced to ask an administrator to block you from editing for an indefinite period of time. I await your response. Sector001 (talk) 06:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011 Warning

- Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. - * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. - * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. - Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. -
- FINAL WARNING: If you make any further revisions and "spin" to Tim Jones (politician) I will report you to a Wikipedia administrator and ask you be blocked from future editing. I've made more than a good faith effort to accomodate you, even rewriting the "birther" lawsuit section and providing even more reliable sources. I asked you to participate in discussion or arbitration and you refuse. As I've stated before, Wikipedia should not exclude fact-based information just because you think it reflects negatively on Mr. Jones. See the Wikipedia guidelines on Neutral point of view for more information. Sector001 (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN Jones

Hi, your contributions to this biography have been mentioned at the noticeboard Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Requesting_Admin._Arbitration_for_Tim_Jones_.28politician.29 - please move to discussion and comment there, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 07:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tim Jones (politician). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My advise is to identify your objections to the material you keep removing. In the edit summary, the talk page, somewhere. Otherwise, other editors will keep restoring the material. Just silently removing it over and over again won't get you anywhere. Gamaliel (talk) 15:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

FOR THE RECORD -- Tim Jones has NOT made "numerous attempts" to contact me regarding his Wiki. I received ONE nasty and rather threatening e-mail from him on his law firms e-letterhead. I decided screw it, if he wants to be the type of politician that used intimidation to cover up things so be it. Those types always get found out by the media and the voters for who they really are anyway. So, as you will note from the history log of the Tim Jones I've not made any changes to the Wiki since May 18, 2011. I've washed my hands of the situation. However I am NOT responsible for what other editors chose to do. At least three others seem to agree with me that the Participation in Birther Lawsuit section IS relevant to the article and is written from a neutral point of view, as they are the ones now reverting your vandalism/removal. By the way, BlackOpsMo...how would you know that Jones had contacted me unless you yourself are Jones hiding, rather cowardly in my opionion, behind a username or else you are someone very close to him like a staff member, friend or relative. If that is the case, some in the media might even say its a conspiracy to hide factual information. Not the kind of thing condusive to a long political career. Sector001 (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]